[gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass

[Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 832 bytes --]

Hi,

Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>:
> Kindly drop that; the REPO_URI/BRANCH seperation that is in use there 
> really isn't all that useful for bzr ebuilds in my experience- more 
> often then not it winds up biting me in the ass rather then being 
> useful.

> My usage (and understanding of bzr), there isn't a scenario where 
> seperation of the repo and branch applies- you only need the branch 
> uri, that encompasses it all (unlike cvs, where this probably was 
> inherited from).

 Yes, this sounds sane to me, so I will try to work something out.
 
> So... any reason to even have the var seperation like that?

 Nothing I can think of.

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]