From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34666-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Le2fF-0000j3-5a
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:34:13 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A7FBE0329;
	Mon,  2 Mar 2009 07:34:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79F1E0329
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2009 07:34:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQjVOj0+68XXMhUHNQqH
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05
Received: from terra.solaris (p54AE67A8.dip.t-dialin.net [84.174.103.168])
	by post.strato.de (mrclete mo17) (RZmta 18.23)
	with ESMTP id w00ed4l227MDcE for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:34:09 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:33:50 +0100
From: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass
Message-ID: <20090302083350.6d7681f9@terra.solaris>
In-Reply-To: <20090224121808.GA3506@hrair>
References: <20090214132152.2aff08a0@terra.solaris>
 <49970B3F.40809@gentoo.org>
 <499EA27D.5060608@necoro.eu>
 <20090223204528.636b5be9@terra.solaris>
 <20090224121808.GA3506@hrair>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: c65f3fd3-7e90-4c79-b18d-aba2d8ec2f52
X-Archives-Hash: 8395e7550af3ba449f60b4aa2784ca7e

--Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Brian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com>:
> Kindly drop that; the REPO_URI/BRANCH seperation that is in use there=20
> really isn't all that useful for bzr ebuilds in my experience- more=20
> often then not it winds up biting me in the ass rather then being=20
> useful.

> My usage (and understanding of bzr), there isn't a scenario where=20
> seperation of the repo and branch applies- you only need the branch=20
> uri, that encompasses it all (unlike cvs, where this probably was=20
> inherited from).

 Yes, this sounds sane to me, so I will try to work something out.
=20
> So... any reason to even have the var seperation like that?

 Nothing I can think of.

V-Li

--=20
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

--Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmri98ACgkQNQqtfCuFneNO5ACdFcq+lxAwXPH8J6DTD5kasOie
VNQAnRNZLSmqIcnqfCEwMZczqjYK5f75
=lLc/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH--