From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Le2fF-0000j3-5a for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:34:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A7FBE0329; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.182]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79F1E0329 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:34:10 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :K2kKYU+nW/MMMlTokcN5Yot1/Bj/FTl+WviP6RIJci0HRMpbh/x+X6ShOQjVOj0+68XXMhUHNQqH X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from terra.solaris (p54AE67A8.dip.t-dialin.net [84.174.103.168]) by post.strato.de (mrclete mo17) (RZmta 18.23) with ESMTP id w00ed4l227MDcE for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:34:09 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:33:50 +0100 From: Christian Faulhammer To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass Message-ID: <20090302083350.6d7681f9@terra.solaris> In-Reply-To: <20090224121808.GA3506@hrair> References: <20090214132152.2aff08a0@terra.solaris> <49970B3F.40809@gentoo.org> <499EA27D.5060608@necoro.eu> <20090223204528.636b5be9@terra.solaris> <20090224121808.GA3506@hrair> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.12.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: c65f3fd3-7e90-4c79-b18d-aba2d8ec2f52 X-Archives-Hash: 8395e7550af3ba449f60b4aa2784ca7e --Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Brian Harring : > Kindly drop that; the REPO_URI/BRANCH seperation that is in use there=20 > really isn't all that useful for bzr ebuilds in my experience- more=20 > often then not it winds up biting me in the ass rather then being=20 > useful. > My usage (and understanding of bzr), there isn't a scenario where=20 > seperation of the repo and branch applies- you only need the branch=20 > uri, that encompasses it all (unlike cvs, where this probably was=20 > inherited from). Yes, this sounds sane to me, so I will try to work something out. =20 > So... any reason to even have the var seperation like that? Nothing I can think of. V-Li --=20 Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project , #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode --Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmri98ACgkQNQqtfCuFneNO5ACdFcq+lxAwXPH8J6DTD5kasOie VNQAnRNZLSmqIcnqfCEwMZczqjYK5f75 =lLc/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/gkfaft2SKXgYGayOJxfo8aH--