public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Hellermann <stefan@the2masters.de>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:31:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C86BA1.6000101@the2masters.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C867DC.8010004@gentoo.org>

Doug Klima schrieb:
> Stefan Hellermann wrote:
>> Roy Marples schrieb:
>>  
>>>> Two small things happened here:
>>>>
>>>> After Login I the shell looks like:
>>>> -bash-3.2#
>>>> when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment
>>>> is not
>>>> setup correctly the first time.
>>>>       
>>> Doesn't sound like an OpenRC issue as such as bash sets up it's own
>>> prompt. Also, OpenRC isn't responsible for setting up the
>>> environment. At most we suck in what's defined in /etc/profile.env
>>>
>>>    
>>>> when rebooting, INIT stops with "no more processes left in this
>>>> runlevel"
>>>> after "remounting /"
>>>>       
>>> Curious. A suggest you open a bug a http://bugs.marples.name against
>>> openrc so we can move the debugging off this list.
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> Here is something other badly broken :) So I don't think it's a openrc
>> issue.
>>
>> # echo $PATH
>> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
>> # env | grep PATH
>> *nothing*
>> # sysctl   # only a example for a app that works
>> *works*
>> # which sysctl    # this should work if sysctl works without typing
>> /sbin/sysctl
>> which: no sysctl in ((null))
>>
>> I think it could be a CFLAG, I compiled my whole System with
>> -mfpmath=sse (not sse,387),
>> but while emerging openrc there are compiler warnings saying it uses
>> -mfpmath=387 because
>> sse is not available. Does openrc block -msse?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Stefan
>>   
> To hijack this thread, you know you're getting worse performance and
> more problematic results by using -mfpmath=sse. This is the very same
> reason that -march=pentium2 / -march=athlon-tbird and newer based CPUs
> don't enable this flag by default. It requires specific changes to
> system headers.

Thanks for the comment! This is the test-system on a new Via C7, I wanted to do some
performance check's, but haven't so far. I thought it could be a good flag :)

btw: All my problem are gone ... somehow I managed to not install baselayout from Roys
overlay, I only installed openrc.

Thanks Roy for your help!
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-29 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-29 14:12 [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? Ed W
2008-02-29 14:16 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-02-29 15:56   ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:02     ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 16:15       ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:30         ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 17:07         ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 18:32           ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 19:45             ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 19:57               ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 20:15                 ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 20:31                   ` Stefan Hellermann [this message]
2008-02-29 23:17                     ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01  2:08           ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-01  4:59             ` Doug Klima
2008-03-01  5:04               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Blockers (was: Baselayout-2 progress?) Ciaran McCreesh
2008-03-01  9:49               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Baselayout-2 progress? Duncan
2008-03-01 10:50             ` Roy Marles
2008-03-01 19:17               ` Duncan
2008-03-01 22:50           ` [gentoo-dev] " Bernd Steinhauser
2008-03-01 23:42             ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-02  0:55               ` Bernd Steinhauser
2008-02-29 17:01     ` [gentoo-dev] " Roy Marples
2008-02-29 17:50       ` Benedikt Bšoehm
2008-02-29 23:19         ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-02-29 23:23       ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01  0:56         ` Roy Marples
2008-03-01 22:26           ` Ed W
2008-03-01 22:29             ` Roy Marples

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47C86BA1.6000101@the2masters.de \
    --to=stefan@the2masters.de \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox