From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JVBtF-0002ov-CK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:31:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C977E02D5; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.unit.tiscali.de (smtp10.unit.tiscali.de [213.205.33.46]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63F5E02D5 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from the2masters.de (213.146.113.64) by smtp10.unit.tiscali.de (7.3.122) (authenticated as s.hellermann@tiscali.de) id 47975C2A0097222C for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:31:31 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.150] by the2masters.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JVBse-0004ad-QA for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:30:56 +0100 Message-ID: <47C86BA1.6000101@the2masters.de> Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:31:29 +0100 From: Stefan Hellermann User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080218) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? References: <47C812CF.2020903@wildgooses.com> <200802291707.17936.roy@marples.name> <47C84FCC.6040007@the2masters.de> <200802291945.08019.roy@marples.name> <47C8639F.603@the2masters.de> <47C867DC.8010004@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <47C867DC.8010004@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 87d7c39d-c0f2-4b11-9dd7-5a2962624617 X-Archives-Hash: cd184da3899f1a6d920a8499b17f72b5 Doug Klima schrieb: > Stefan Hellermann wrote: >> Roy Marples schrieb: >> >>>> Two small things happened here: >>>> >>>> After Login I the shell looks like: >>>> -bash-3.2# >>>> when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment >>>> is not >>>> setup correctly the first time. >>>> >>> Doesn't sound like an OpenRC issue as such as bash sets up it's own >>> prompt. Also, OpenRC isn't responsible for setting up the >>> environment. At most we suck in what's defined in /etc/profile.env >>> >>> >>>> when rebooting, INIT stops with "no more processes left in this >>>> runlevel" >>>> after "remounting /" >>>> >>> Curious. A suggest you open a bug a http://bugs.marples.name against >>> openrc so we can move the debugging off this list. >>> >>> >> >> Here is something other badly broken :) So I don't think it's a openrc >> issue. >> >> # echo $PATH >> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin >> # env | grep PATH >> *nothing* >> # sysctl # only a example for a app that works >> *works* >> # which sysctl # this should work if sysctl works without typing >> /sbin/sysctl >> which: no sysctl in ((null)) >> >> I think it could be a CFLAG, I compiled my whole System with >> -mfpmath=sse (not sse,387), >> but while emerging openrc there are compiler warnings saying it uses >> -mfpmath=387 because >> sse is not available. Does openrc block -msse? >> >> Cheers >> Stefan >> > To hijack this thread, you know you're getting worse performance and > more problematic results by using -mfpmath=sse. This is the very same > reason that -march=pentium2 / -march=athlon-tbird and newer based CPUs > don't enable this flag by default. It requires specific changes to > system headers. Thanks for the comment! This is the test-system on a new Via C7, I wanted to do some performance check's, but haven't so far. I thought it could be a good flag :) btw: All my problem are gone ... somehow I managed to not install baselayout from Roys overlay, I only installed openrc. Thanks Roy for your help! -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list