From: Roy Marles <roy@marples.name>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Baselayout-2 progress?
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 10:50:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200803011050.50697.roy@marples.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2008.03.01.02.08.43@cox.net>
On Saturday 01 March 2008 02:08:44 Duncan wrote:
> Is direct upgrade from previous baselayout-2.0.0-rcX going to be
> supported?
Existing configs should work just fine - with the exception of the modules
config. It's been moved to /etc/conf.d/modules instead of
the /etc/modules.autoload.d folder. There is no automated migration as
complex setups would go wrong.
> I was running that for some time and just now added and
> upgraded to the via layman version. There's a blocker, of course, as
> openrc is now providing most of the files that baselayout did.
>
> The problem is that unmerging the old 2.0.0-rcX baselayout in ordered to
> resolve the blockage is SCARY, since it leaves the system basically
> unbootable until the new setup is merged and at least basically
> configured. There's also the issue of not knowing for sure just what's
> going to still be around in terms of config files and the like, since
> unmerging baselayout isn't exactly an everyday thing.
>
> FWIW, I took the jump anyway, and the etc-update seemed to go reasonably
> well, but I've not rebooted yet...
As others pointed out, this is a package manager issue and those blockers are
there because of this. Not an OpenRC issue as such ;)
Thanks
Roy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-01 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-29 14:12 [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? Ed W
2008-02-29 14:16 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-02-29 15:56 ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:02 ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 16:15 ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:30 ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 17:07 ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 18:32 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 19:45 ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 19:57 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 20:15 ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 20:31 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 23:17 ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01 2:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-01 4:59 ` Doug Klima
2008-03-01 5:04 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Blockers (was: Baselayout-2 progress?) Ciaran McCreesh
2008-03-01 9:49 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Baselayout-2 progress? Duncan
2008-03-01 10:50 ` Roy Marles [this message]
2008-03-01 19:17 ` Duncan
2008-03-01 22:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bernd Steinhauser
2008-03-01 23:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-02 0:55 ` Bernd Steinhauser
2008-02-29 17:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Roy Marples
2008-02-29 17:50 ` Benedikt Boehm
2008-02-29 23:19 ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-02-29 23:23 ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01 0:56 ` Roy Marples
2008-03-01 22:26 ` Ed W
2008-03-01 22:29 ` Roy Marples
[not found] <a2efU-75I-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <a2fYm-1sf-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <a2g80-1Ez-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <a2gUx-2Ys-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <a2IQE-4Hb-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <a2JCW-5X9-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <a2KIK-7AU-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-03-02 15:12 ` [gentoo-dev] " Vaeth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200803011050.50697.roy@marples.name \
--to=roy@marples.name \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox