public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Klima <cardoe@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Baselayout-2 progress?
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:59:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C8E29A.2020003@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2008.03.01.02.08.43@cox.net>

Duncan wrote:
> Roy Marples <roy@marples.name> posted 200802291707.17936.roy@marples.name,
> excerpted below, on  Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:07:17 +0000:
> 
>> On Friday 29 February 2008 16:15:51 Ed W wrote:
>>> On the other hand since there still isn't a masked ebuild in portage
>>> (and I seem some notes on my on Roy's site) then I have to assume that
>>> in fact we are still a good way away from calling it a replacement and
>>> starting to push it out to users?
>> It's actually been very stable and usable for a long time. It's not, and
>> never will be a 100% drop in replacement for everything baselayout
>> provides, but it's very very compatible.
> 
> Is direct upgrade from previous baselayout-2.0.0-rcX going to be 
> supported?  I was running that for some time and just now added and
> upgraded to the via layman version.  There's a blocker, of course, as 
> openrc is now providing most of the files that baselayout did.

You just answered your own question. If another package now provides 
files that an existing package provides, they must be blockers. 
Considering baselayout-2.0.0_rcX was a masked version and never 
recommended, it's also not in the direct upgrade path. The proper 
upgrade is what you've detailed out below. Such are the risks when you 
unmask a package and install it on your machine.

> 
> The problem is that unmerging the old 2.0.0-rcX baselayout in ordered to 
> resolve the blockage is SCARY, since it leaves the system basically 
> unbootable until the new setup is merged and at least basically 
> configured.  There's also the issue of not knowing for sure just what's 
> going to still be around in terms of config files and the like, since 
> unmerging baselayout isn't exactly an everyday thing.
> 
> FWIW, I took the jump anyway, and the etc-update seemed to go reasonably 
> well, but I've not rebooted yet...
> 


-- 
Doug Klima <cardoe@gentoo.org>
http://dev.gentoo.org/~cardoe/
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-01  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-29 14:12 [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? Ed W
2008-02-29 14:16 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-02-29 15:56   ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:02     ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 16:15       ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:30         ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 17:07         ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 18:32           ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 19:45             ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 19:57               ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 20:15                 ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 20:31                   ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 23:17                     ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01  2:08           ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-01  4:59             ` Doug Klima [this message]
2008-03-01  5:04               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Blockers (was: Baselayout-2 progress?) Ciaran McCreesh
2008-03-01  9:49               ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Baselayout-2 progress? Duncan
2008-03-01 10:50             ` Roy Marles
2008-03-01 19:17               ` Duncan
2008-03-01 22:50           ` [gentoo-dev] " Bernd Steinhauser
2008-03-01 23:42             ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-02  0:55               ` Bernd Steinhauser
2008-02-29 17:01     ` [gentoo-dev] " Roy Marples
2008-02-29 17:50       ` Benedikt Bšoehm
2008-02-29 23:19         ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-02-29 23:23       ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01  0:56         ` Roy Marples
2008-03-01 22:26           ` Ed W
2008-03-01 22:29             ` Roy Marples
     [not found] <a2efU-75I-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <a2fYm-1sf-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <a2g80-1Ez-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <a2gUx-2Ys-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <a2IQE-4Hb-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <a2JCW-5X9-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <a2KIK-7AU-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-03-02 15:12             ` [gentoo-dev] " Vaeth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47C8E29A.2020003@gentoo.org \
    --to=cardoe@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox