From: Doug Klima <cardoe@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress?
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:15:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C867DC.8010004@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47C8639F.603@the2masters.de>
Stefan Hellermann wrote:
> Roy Marples schrieb:
>
>>> Two small things happened here:
>>>
>>> After Login I the shell looks like:
>>> -bash-3.2#
>>> when I start then bash again manually it looks nice, the environment is not
>>> setup correctly the first time.
>>>
>> Doesn't sound like an OpenRC issue as such as bash sets up it's own prompt.
>> Also, OpenRC isn't responsible for setting up the environment. At most we
>> suck in what's defined in /etc/profile.env
>>
>>
>>> when rebooting, INIT stops with "no more processes left in this runlevel"
>>> after "remounting /"
>>>
>> Curious. A suggest you open a bug a http://bugs.marples.name against openrc so
>> we can move the debugging off this list.
>>
>>
>
> Here is something other badly broken :) So I don't think it's a openrc issue.
>
> # echo $PATH
> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
> # env | grep PATH
> *nothing*
> # sysctl # only a example for a app that works
> *works*
> # which sysctl # this should work if sysctl works without typing /sbin/sysctl
> which: no sysctl in ((null))
>
> I think it could be a CFLAG, I compiled my whole System with -mfpmath=sse (not sse,387),
> but while emerging openrc there are compiler warnings saying it uses -mfpmath=387 because
> sse is not available. Does openrc block -msse?
>
> Cheers
> Stefan
>
To hijack this thread, you know you're getting worse performance and
more problematic results by using -mfpmath=sse. This is the very same
reason that -march=pentium2 / -march=athlon-tbird and newer based CPUs
don't enable this flag by default. It requires specific changes to
system headers.
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-29 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-29 14:12 [gentoo-dev] Baselayout-2 progress? Ed W
2008-02-29 14:16 ` Alon Bar-Lev
2008-02-29 15:56 ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:02 ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 16:15 ` Ed W
2008-02-29 16:30 ` Doug Klima
2008-02-29 17:07 ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 18:32 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 19:45 ` Roy Marples
2008-02-29 19:57 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 20:15 ` Doug Klima [this message]
2008-02-29 20:31 ` Stefan Hellermann
2008-02-29 23:17 ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01 2:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-01 4:59 ` Doug Klima
2008-03-01 5:04 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Blockers (was: Baselayout-2 progress?) Ciaran McCreesh
2008-03-01 9:49 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Baselayout-2 progress? Duncan
2008-03-01 10:50 ` Roy Marles
2008-03-01 19:17 ` Duncan
2008-03-01 22:50 ` [gentoo-dev] " Bernd Steinhauser
2008-03-01 23:42 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2008-03-02 0:55 ` Bernd Steinhauser
2008-02-29 17:01 ` [gentoo-dev] " Roy Marples
2008-02-29 17:50 ` Benedikt Boehm
2008-02-29 23:19 ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-02-29 23:23 ` Ed Wildgoose
2008-03-01 0:56 ` Roy Marples
2008-03-01 22:26 ` Ed W
2008-03-01 22:29 ` Roy Marples
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C867DC.8010004@gentoo.org \
--to=cardoe@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox