* [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support
@ 2007-11-05 15:19 Piotr Jaroszyński
2007-11-05 15:25 ` Mart Raudsepp
2007-11-05 15:54 ` Graham Murray
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Piotr Jaroszyński @ 2007-11-05 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hello,
I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
(kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
each package that needs it.
I have just added a local "visibility" flag for paludis and that's also my
candidate for the global one, but better names are welcome.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support
2007-11-05 15:19 [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support Piotr Jaroszyński
@ 2007-11-05 15:25 ` Mart Raudsepp
2007-11-05 20:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-11-05 15:54 ` Graham Murray
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mart Raudsepp @ 2007-11-05 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1019 bytes --]
On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
> in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
> (kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
> each package that needs it.
Why do they need it, is the question. If it's supported and stable, it
should just be enabled, end of story, in my opinion. I believe it was
optional in KDE due to it not being stable for some reason (either GCCs
at the time were sketchy or their build system problems weren't smoothed
out, I guess).
> I have just added a local "visibility" flag for paludis and that's also my
> candidate for the global one, but better names are welcome.
Why not enable it by default and unconditionally (other than GCC version
being used supporting it) in this specific case?
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: leio@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support
2007-11-05 15:19 [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support Piotr Jaroszyński
2007-11-05 15:25 ` Mart Raudsepp
@ 2007-11-05 15:54 ` Graham Murray
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Graham Murray @ 2007-11-05 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@gentoo.org> writes:
> I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility support
> in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
> (kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one for
> each package that needs it.
Some packages, such as mozilla-firefox, enable visibility support
without the use of a USE flag.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support
2007-11-05 15:25 ` Mart Raudsepp
@ 2007-11-05 20:13 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2007-11-05 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1131 bytes --]
On Monday 05 November 2007, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility
> > support in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one
> > (kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one
> > for each package that needs it.
>
> Why do they need it, is the question. If it's supported and stable, it
> should just be enabled, end of story, in my opinion. I believe it was
> optional in KDE due to it not being stable for some reason (either GCCs
> at the time were sketchy or their build system problems weren't smoothed
> out, I guess).
>
> > I have just added a local "visibility" flag for paludis and that's also
> > my candidate for the global one, but better names are welcome.
>
> Why not enable it by default and unconditionally (other than GCC version
> being used supporting it) in this specific case?
this sounds good to me too ... binding USE flags to compiler options is
generally frowned upon and we should avoid it when possible.
-mike
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-05 20:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-05 15:19 [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support Piotr Jaroszyński
2007-11-05 15:25 ` Mart Raudsepp
2007-11-05 20:13 ` Mike Frysinger
2007-11-05 15:54 ` Graham Murray
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox