From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ip3w5-0004d5-Kx for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:32:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lA5FVHoT009488; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:31:17 GMT Received: from smtp-out.neti.ee (smtp-out.neti.ee [194.126.126.39]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA5FTAQH006620 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 15:29:10 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at estpak.ee Received: from Relayhost1.neti.ee (Relayhost1 [88.196.174.141]) by MXR-8.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C19A122901 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:29:05 +0200 (EET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support From: Mart Raudsepp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <200711051619.33937.peper@gentoo.org> References: <200711051619.33937.peper@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NEzANsQw+rbwR4Hlvztz" Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:25:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1194276334.28930.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 X-Archives-Salt: 48c4420e-c3e5-4eba-8773-37797a1989aa X-Archives-Hash: 80b89ec441ee21b6931649375a4065a3 --=-NEzANsQw+rbwR4Hlvztz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility supp= ort=20 > in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one=20 > (kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one f= or=20 > each package that needs it. Why do they need it, is the question. If it's supported and stable, it should just be enabled, end of story, in my opinion. I believe it was optional in KDE due to it not being stable for some reason (either GCCs at the time were sketchy or their build system problems weren't smoothed out, I guess). > I have just added a local "visibility" flag for paludis and that's also m= y=20 > candidate for the global one, but better names are welcome. Why not enable it by default and unconditionally (other than GCC version being used supporting it) in this specific case? --=20 Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: leio@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio --=-NEzANsQw+rbwR4Hlvztz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHLzXukeYb6olFHJcRAuF1AJoDc/NKwjIOijeXNavMcKGxpGv7cQCeNejP tncQf6nJ+F38yE4XeK6MmZU= =1EMR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NEzANsQw+rbwR4Hlvztz-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list