From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ip8Mt-0006PE-ED for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:16:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lA5KFOhP031129; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:15:24 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lA5KDWri028806 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:13:32 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AD16530E for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2007 20:13:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 16:13:30 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711051619.33937.peper@gentoo.org> <1194276334.28930.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1194276334.28930.2.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2345394.eA9jOb6f1g"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200711051513.30798.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: e04d022e-3b58-487f-a3a1-c669761b0070 X-Archives-Hash: 77451836360ae14060515d5128077d62 --nextPart2345394.eA9jOb6f1g Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 05 November 2007, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > On E, 2007-11-05 at 16:19 +0100, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I think it's time to add a more general flag for enabling visibility > > support in packages as currently there is only a kde specific one > > (kdehiddenvisibility) and I don't think it makes sense to add a new one > > for each package that needs it. > > Why do they need it, is the question. If it's supported and stable, it > should just be enabled, end of story, in my opinion. I believe it was > optional in KDE due to it not being stable for some reason (either GCCs > at the time were sketchy or their build system problems weren't smoothed > out, I guess). > > > I have just added a local "visibility" flag for paludis and that's also > > my candidate for the global one, but better names are welcome. > > Why not enable it by default and unconditionally (other than GCC version > being used supporting it) in this specific case? this sounds good to me too ... binding USE flags to compiler options is=20 generally frowned upon and we should avoid it when possible. =2Dmike --nextPart2345394.eA9jOb6f1g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUARy95akFjO5/oN/WBAQIgMBAArmeTV3Ed3KoqyDCLeNsEGFvNzieBK9rD FOslNomEABeO0buwy+2+8QlkDTLfHGK+V1EFrcXhyzxxFkprSgnOoECV/veheoZe 9TFEuarfbz2LF+BoBW+8kfhJp4l9t5M9k8xhe28kyo1Pi3IGo4BLxsJdKXNhxZN6 6EA5U7UcWAvA+l1pIrXa/i3xBCBHs7mNVZvtOgYhRYNgOlkQRXSOMQWqMbRzZ1Ax mh1ESEb6a1kut6Yzg3iko9DIVyJhjqI1LAlY+RtX4Q1zDOn/m7oipYCPH66aAyhR nTKPKDJbNNMboYcHKIqTAQvw2a+sOzRmWBPFPhmGtSk6l7fk56MuxDHogL+mnmOj wV04+UNiEYwo2P8Rac08zwdXMhi6NggxQzFP2k7vq3WvqgbZ0MuqZGfdE+4iFfqa d0GqQZwdKWjrs8eJo+ZY7gdt8CXkb96dHvxUfC2N/gfb8M0O+qlqIm/FO4WlEbBV kzeHvdDButSSeXcs6ROM0gnKTAAi73Jqm5XeeQBNzpoxhAnrLynDZMaYFlEFFjtp lZCIxeyW/SmqIw3VQ1wQhvEMWN3iqyOIFRMXQ/BL+0FQFZApyHXgtBnuOBXYpZBE o0QwECuMekJcs6OrLuCDLybMJ+cNwzbTsBLu2sbQyvI3TVm144N9Lkig9PyllyR9 xlKVwB3hZWk= =72d2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2345394.eA9jOb6f1g-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list