* [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
@ 2009-08-21 0:09 Allan Gottlieb
2009-08-21 4:48 ` Keith Dart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Allan Gottlieb @ 2009-08-21 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
I have had both epiphany and firefox on my machine for quite a while,
but the latest stable of each are now "incompatible".
Specifically they require incompatible versions of xulrunner.
Is there a reason why epiphany cannot use xulrunner-1.9-1?
thanks,
allan
================================================================
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
net-libs/xulrunner:1.9
('ebuild', '/', 'net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1.2-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
>=net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1.2[java] required by ('ebuild', '/', 'www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1', 'merge')
(and 2 more)
('installed', '/', 'net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0.11-r1', 'nomerge') pulled in by
=net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/', 'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge')
(and 2 more)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
2009-08-21 0:09 [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner Allan Gottlieb
@ 2009-08-21 4:48 ` Keith Dart
2009-08-21 5:29 ` Beau Henderson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keith Dart @ 2009-08-21 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
=== On Thu, 08/20, Allan Gottlieb wrote: ===
> =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/',
> 'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge')
===
The latest version of epiphany is 2.26.3. try unmerging your epiphany
first.
-- Keith Dart
--
-- --------------------
Keith Dart
<keith@dartworks.biz>
=======================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
2009-08-21 4:48 ` Keith Dart
@ 2009-08-21 5:29 ` Beau Henderson
2009-08-21 5:52 ` Keith Dart
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Beau Henderson @ 2009-08-21 5:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Keith Dart wrote:
> === On Thu, 08/20, Allan Gottlieb wrote: ===
>> =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/',
>> 'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge')
> ===
>
> The latest version of epiphany is 2.26.3. try unmerging your epiphany
> first.
>
>
> -- Keith Dart
>
Not if your @stable.
I'm probably going to wait it out but I may re-compile epiphany using webkit if the slot conflict
pursues.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
2009-08-21 5:29 ` Beau Henderson
@ 2009-08-21 5:52 ` Keith Dart
2009-08-21 22:34 ` Allan Gottlieb
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keith Dart @ 2009-08-21 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
=== On Fri, 08/21, Beau Henderson wrote: ===
> Not if your @stable.
===
But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
-- Keith Dart
--
-- --------------------
Keith Dart
<keith@dartworks.biz>
=======================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
2009-08-21 5:52 ` Keith Dart
@ 2009-08-21 22:34 ` Allan Gottlieb
2009-08-21 23:09 ` Arttu V.
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Allan Gottlieb @ 2009-08-21 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
At Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:52:31 -0700 Keith Dart <keith@dartworks.biz> wrote:
> === On Fri, 08/21, Beau Henderson wrote: ===
>> Not if your @stable.
>
> ===
>
> But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
Something must have been funny. My system is stable and it did ask for
firefox 3.5 (as I showed in my original post). However, the problem has
disappeared with today's sync. Apparently all is now well.
Thanks,
allan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
2009-08-21 22:34 ` Allan Gottlieb
@ 2009-08-21 23:09 ` Arttu V.
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arttu V. @ 2009-08-21 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 8/22/09, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu> wrote:
>> But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
>
> Something must have been funny. My system is stable and it did ask for
> firefox 3.5 (as I showed in my original post). However, the problem has
> disappeared with today's sync. Apparently all is now well.
You're lucky as you caught a sync during the hours when ff 3.5
actually was stable for some select arches:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280393
--
Arttu V.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-21 23:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-21 0:09 [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner Allan Gottlieb
2009-08-21 4:48 ` Keith Dart
2009-08-21 5:29 ` Beau Henderson
2009-08-21 5:52 ` Keith Dart
2009-08-21 22:34 ` Allan Gottlieb
2009-08-21 23:09 ` Arttu V.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox