public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
@ 2009-08-21  0:09 Allan Gottlieb
  2009-08-21  4:48 ` Keith Dart
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Allan Gottlieb @ 2009-08-21  0:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

I have had both epiphany and firefox on my machine for quite a while,
but the latest stable of each are now "incompatible".
Specifically they require incompatible versions of xulrunner.

Is there a reason why epiphany cannot use xulrunner-1.9-1?

thanks,
allan

================================================================

!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

net-libs/xulrunner:1.9

  ('ebuild', '/', 'net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1.2-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
    >=net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1.2[java] required by ('ebuild', '/', 'www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5.2-r1', 'merge')
    (and 2 more)

  ('installed', '/', 'net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0.11-r1', 'nomerge') pulled in by
    =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/', 'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge')
    (and 2 more)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
  2009-08-21  0:09 [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner Allan Gottlieb
@ 2009-08-21  4:48 ` Keith Dart
  2009-08-21  5:29   ` Beau Henderson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keith Dart @ 2009-08-21  4:48 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

=== On Thu, 08/20, Allan Gottlieb wrote: ===
>    =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/',
> 'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge') 
===

The latest version of epiphany is 2.26.3. try unmerging your epiphany
first.


-- Keith Dart

-- 
-- --------------------
Keith Dart
<keith@dartworks.biz>
=======================



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
  2009-08-21  4:48 ` Keith Dart
@ 2009-08-21  5:29   ` Beau Henderson
  2009-08-21  5:52     ` Keith Dart
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Beau Henderson @ 2009-08-21  5:29 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Keith Dart wrote:
> === On Thu, 08/20, Allan Gottlieb wrote: ===
>>    =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.0* required by ('installed', '/',
>> 'www-client/epiphany-2.24.3-r10', 'nomerge') 
> ===
> 
> The latest version of epiphany is 2.26.3. try unmerging your epiphany
> first.
> 
> 
> -- Keith Dart
> 

Not if your @stable.

I'm probably going to wait it out but I may re-compile epiphany using webkit if the slot conflict 
pursues.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
  2009-08-21  5:29   ` Beau Henderson
@ 2009-08-21  5:52     ` Keith Dart
  2009-08-21 22:34       ` Allan Gottlieb
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Keith Dart @ 2009-08-21  5:52 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

=== On Fri, 08/21, Beau Henderson wrote: ===
> Not if your @stable.

===

But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here. 


-- Keith Dart

-- 
-- --------------------
Keith Dart
<keith@dartworks.biz>
=======================



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner
  2009-08-21  5:52     ` Keith Dart
@ 2009-08-21 22:34       ` Allan Gottlieb
  2009-08-21 23:09         ` Arttu V.
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Allan Gottlieb @ 2009-08-21 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

At Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:52:31 -0700 Keith Dart <keith@dartworks.biz> wrote:

> === On Fri, 08/21, Beau Henderson wrote: ===
>> Not if your @stable.
>
> ===
>
> But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here. 

Something must have been funny.  My system is stable and it did ask for
firefox 3.5 (as I showed in my original post).  However, the problem has
disappeared with today's sync.  Apparently all is now well.

Thanks,
allan



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of  xulrunner
  2009-08-21 22:34       ` Allan Gottlieb
@ 2009-08-21 23:09         ` Arttu V.
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Arttu V. @ 2009-08-21 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On 8/22/09, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu> wrote:
>> But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
>
> Something must have been funny.  My system is stable and it did ask for
> firefox 3.5 (as I showed in my original post).  However, the problem has
> disappeared with today's sync.  Apparently all is now well.

You're lucky as you caught a sync during the hours when ff 3.5
actually was stable for some select arches:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280393

-- 
Arttu V.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-21 23:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-21  0:09 [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of xulrunner Allan Gottlieb
2009-08-21  4:48 ` Keith Dart
2009-08-21  5:29   ` Beau Henderson
2009-08-21  5:52     ` Keith Dart
2009-08-21 22:34       ` Allan Gottlieb
2009-08-21 23:09         ` Arttu V.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox