From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-99219-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MedEl-0006kx-O8
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:09:35 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5A2BE05E4;
Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:09:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f218.google.com (mail-ew0-f218.google.com [209.85.219.218])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D64CE05E4
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:09:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy18 with SMTP id 18so1142967ewy.14
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=pFksqpjM5iokOR0v2Vw13v0kTn8CDXxgv3ZjRRgzZFw=;
b=ufbumxs/b2YnLHZlGugAL9C+AYxSqcSbQDZ30jS7DR6W2srmx0uwkY6MiPvh0Fq7fc
JChIhyqqdtgTtN2Wb1nkth5Zkrefyx188d2tETPJEuawV76U33HRNlEYgJ3abss6A9+k
Efpz526bGVOmjZkdMdlXuBoh4O2gH3a3g4DlM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=d9r7Z7DyXg7ttFEHj5f1MlkNldOjOTgeQJYCHx3ZzaQrVWJ0ZkOpbyTPtEChvMAOfe
8XtNPKSe9WyyU99e/2hjb2O6/kFc2mkhvgEhDMBf8cJkgF/uofZpQNRL8MExZGqGW3sA
2kd3GcTO6x+9wSoQlBgAhFlHW8KmminnGM3M4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.210.58.12 with SMTP id g12mr1796244eba.66.1250896172805; Fri,
21 Aug 2009 16:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <yu9ws4weqyk.fsf@nyu.edu>
References: <yu9ocqam3j0.fsf@nyu.edu> <20090820214813.14974503@dartworks.biz>
<4A8E30D3.9070004@thehenderson.com>
<20090820225231.1da6bc65@dartworks.biz> <yu9ws4weqyk.fsf@nyu.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 02:09:32 +0300
Message-ID: <fecdbac60908211609q2497af89u6faff1601e2f9a86@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] epiphany and firefox want incompatible versions of
xulrunner
From: "Arttu V." <arttuv69@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: b4f74c82-03df-49eb-af93-a42325a98c03
X-Archives-Hash: a9de4a19e8dd682be5e4515919ed6eb2
On 8/22/09, Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu> wrote:
>> But firefox 3.5 is not marked stable. Then there is some mixup here.
>
> Something must have been funny. My system is stable and it did ask for
> firefox 3.5 (as I showed in my original post). However, the problem has
> disappeared with today's sync. Apparently all is now well.
You're lucky as you caught a sync during the hours when ff 3.5
actually was stable for some select arches:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=280393
--
Arttu V.