* [gentoo-science] New Release Of GCL (GNU Common Lisp)
@ 2013-08-31 16:28 Frank Peters
2013-09-02 17:18 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Frank Peters @ 2013-08-31 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
Hello,
GCL, or GNU Common Lisp, has been masked in Gentoo for some time,
but it's still the fastest (and best?) Lisp to be used with Maxima,
the symbolic math package.
The reason for the mask is found in the message when attempting
to emerge gcl-2.6.8-pre-release:
# Masked for increasingly many problems. Upstream is flaky and hasn't released since 2005.
# Maxima is the only consumer and can be built with sbcl or clisp.
# Hopefully upstream will do a release that we can add to revive this package.
I've been compiling the patched Fedora source (gcl-2.6.8-pre-release) to use
with Maxima and it works very well.
However, this past week, new final releases of gcl-2.6.8 and gcl-2.6.9
have officilly been made. Does this mean that soon GCL will be unmasked
in the portage tree?
Also, if anyone happens to know, what is the reason for releasing both
gcl 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 together? Should we just skip 2.6.8 entirely and
use 2.6.9, or is there still some virtue with 2.6.8?
Frank Peters
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-science] New Release Of GCL (GNU Common Lisp)
2013-08-31 16:28 [gentoo-science] New Release Of GCL (GNU Common Lisp) Frank Peters
@ 2013-09-02 17:18 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2013-09-03 3:50 ` Frank Peters
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Panagiotis Christopoulos @ 2013-09-02 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-science
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 806 bytes --]
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net>wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi,
>
> ...
>
> However, this past week, new final releases of gcl-2.6.8 and gcl-2.6.9
> have officilly been made. Does this mean that soon GCL will be unmasked
> in the portage tree?
>
> Also, if anyone happens to know, what is the reason for releasing both
> gcl 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 together? Should we just skip 2.6.8 entirely and
> use 2.6.9, or is there still some virtue with 2.6.8?
>
> Frank Peters
>
I could give a try compiling it as you're (and possibly others) interested.
I think Mr. Grozin (grozin) had done some work previously, maybe he has
already some ebuilds. I will ask him what he thinks. The lisp team is
currently understaffed, cannot give you any ETA.
Panagiotis
(pchrist at gentoo dot org)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1396 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-03 3:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-08-31 16:28 [gentoo-science] New Release Of GCL (GNU Common Lisp) Frank Peters
2013-09-02 17:18 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2013-09-03 3:50 ` Frank Peters
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox