From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDC11381F3 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52ADDE0C09; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com (mail-oa0-f42.google.com [209.85.219.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82469E0BFE for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 17:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n12so1508430oag.1 for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7zLScrBCX86vNJBIWyGkKX/BXL0CQqr1W45vUcA2P+g=; b=MXn8unDfymj2sv/7tV5hMQ0CNVrk/bixyJSu/v0yuEYD1PhYTyS4Mgca3yEnvHjvKZ Vm6hUevyolS+QocFe6chl7lqXoOlOWUUxpDv2v1ffnlWd6i1VK9VVObg2xAs23SjknXq 5CpYL+kasJGbquBS7ioBQ3/jLz2iNhRUXqbwLV5wmK/V/eID+b+Vpyxt5QH1dcNV2czL Z/kv6hOaH0d4ZU3s5Ncil+xiuuk4CyP5NIAlgwvEDYoEFVrJ/nwrewwAX6stSrdMzsi8 Dss1r9X0Yj9J+h6uZ08C37rB91NrPCbNxe+fcxqP5ovftq28p6GMMvkNKTk3EhgUN/sn NVQA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.63.116 with SMTP id f20mr17902286oes.29.1378142304576; Mon, 02 Sep 2013 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.167.105 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Sep 2013 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130831122828.60bd0cc53c5d014741084fcf@comcast.net> References: <20130831122828.60bd0cc53c5d014741084fcf@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 20:18:24 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] New Release Of GCL (GNU Common Lisp) From: Panagiotis Christopoulos To: gentoo-science@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2189e83abe704e569c237 X-Archives-Salt: e1aa9689-f7df-4aad-ae39-af4573437f16 X-Archives-Hash: 289cb569474c91db0866fea8b60a9b91 --001a11c2189e83abe704e569c237 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Frank Peters wrote: > Hello, > Hi, > > ... > > However, this past week, new final releases of gcl-2.6.8 and gcl-2.6.9 > have officilly been made. Does this mean that soon GCL will be unmasked > in the portage tree? > > Also, if anyone happens to know, what is the reason for releasing both > gcl 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 together? Should we just skip 2.6.8 entirely and > use 2.6.9, or is there still some virtue with 2.6.8? > > Frank Peters > I could give a try compiling it as you're (and possibly others) interested. I think Mr. Grozin (grozin) had done some work previously, maybe he has already some ebuilds. I will ask him what he thinks. The lisp team is currently understaffed, cannot give you any ETA. Panagiotis (pchrist at gentoo dot org) --001a11c2189e83abe704e569c237 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Frank Peters <fra= nk.peters@comcast.net> wrote:
<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
Hello,
Hi,

...

However, this past week, new final releases of gcl-2.6.8 and gcl-2.6.9
have officilly been made. =A0Does this mean that soon GCL will be unmasked<= br> in the portage tree?

Also, if anyone happens to know, what is the reason for releasing both
gcl 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 together? =A0Should we just skip 2.6.8 entirely and
use 2.6.9, or is there still some virtue with 2.6.8?

Frank Peters

I could give= a try compiling it as you're (and possibly others) interested. I think= Mr. Grozin (grozin) had done some work previously, maybe he has already so= me ebuilds. I will ask him what he thinks. The lisp team is currently under= staffed, cannot give you any ETA.

Panagiotis
(pchrist at gentoo dot org)

--001a11c2189e83abe704e569c237--