Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12

[Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>]

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Dnia 2014-07-31, o godz. 22:17:59
> Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Yes, exactly. We need to get dynamic-deps right if they are ever
>> > supposed to become the default. That's one of the reasons that we want
>> > to revert the problematic changes and make Portage use the default
>> > model once again.
>>
>> Do we actually have some kind of list of issues with dynamic deps?
>> The only specific one that I think I've seen is with prerm and subslot
>> deps, but as was pointed out that issue actually is as much of a
>> problem with static deps unless you unmerge all the reverse-deps
>> before upgrading anything, followed by a re-merge.
>
> I already listed the major issues in my second reply to Michael. And I
> forgot about prerm() again, thanks for adding it :).

Any chance of a link?  I'm honestly not finding this list in my list
history, and a search on gmane for kensington with your from address
only comes up with one email in the last few weeks - the one I replied
to.

Is it possible you're referring to a private email, or some list not on gmane?

Rich