From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC85C1391DB for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E158E082D; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:31:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com (mail-vc0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72A46E081B for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 09:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ij19so6047058vcb.25 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 02:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4GCR70rW5MAITAGJ3gxwAVLg18SmB1V5jqQkeDohrTo=; b=Lj7SLOnWg8EMrE9pBklrNsNLcyZJIMIW2urbuG3EbAZ+HES3PTsGMJVuK1f1gejY8q Qsv7Fuu2AdR9rvyjm6CL1el5dXtzKdlamXI8HofiMoqpcn7AJilDQ7s+g7MpGr3aLa0d zM0moazIsWLYuTJAyfbC/YWOUXeh3AgfwTCfW67inkPIgUWd9pa4LDuyGo67TthKHCKT ze0B87O9ZTXYzN1/4ifHRfmeBJjjoLn9RmRPtKe+RLFOcKRFUuMk+P1abC9uvH1lPPF8 cTGCmqUUIBGHTyi/R+iW/8nJgxGzRTJRXpn4QN6yZlc8+YrTwGHTfADx1Qflfun5oaQc s1TQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.131.207 with SMTP id y15mr509983vcs.71.1406885500450; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 02:31:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.8.229 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 02:31:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140801085157.37145213@pomiot.lan> References: <21463.26330.847055.224071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20140731211239.0eb282cb@pomiot.lan> <20140801085157.37145213@pomiot.lan> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 05:31:40 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jQ6Gs5JTxWeaLI4_Zh0eqFcfvMg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12 From: Rich Freeman To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, Michael Palimaka Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8b6ef647-118f-4443-a0bd-6fa8665b7e7e X-Archives-Hash: f18cb57e57e70512ca5d32f5dc30d75d On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny = wrote: > Dnia 2014-07-31, o godz. 22:17:59 > Rich Freeman napisa=C5=82(a): > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: >> > >> > Yes, exactly. We need to get dynamic-deps right if they are ever >> > supposed to become the default. That's one of the reasons that we want >> > to revert the problematic changes and make Portage use the default >> > model once again. >> >> Do we actually have some kind of list of issues with dynamic deps? >> The only specific one that I think I've seen is with prerm and subslot >> deps, but as was pointed out that issue actually is as much of a >> problem with static deps unless you unmerge all the reverse-deps >> before upgrading anything, followed by a re-merge. > > I already listed the major issues in my second reply to Michael. And I > forgot about prerm() again, thanks for adding it :). Any chance of a link? I'm honestly not finding this list in my list history, and a search on gmane for kensington with your from address only comes up with one email in the last few weeks - the one I replied to. Is it possible you're referring to a private email, or some list not on gma= ne? Rich