From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:25:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGfcS_nkqY243x36svwVXdXiMr653JbJxEUhkd_xX=da9-RFoQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53EA4B26.10608@gentoo.org>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> I don't consider a recommended style message to be 'broken' just
> because it's not listed in the devmanual/PMS/etc as a requirement.
> The implementation of it, on the other hand, yes that could be broken
> and in this case should be fixed if we keep the check around.
>
If we are bothered enough by something to have repoman check it, we
can be bothered enough to add it to the devmanual.
I think we need to decide whether we care about periods at the ends of
DESCRIPTIONs. If we do, then it should be a warning and devs should
fix their ebuilds at the next convenient opportunity. If we don't,
then let's just drop the warning.
I'm fine with the separation of hard/soft errors, because some issues
could be situational and left to developer discretion. However, we
wouldn't want to hide those, because if a dev introduces a new issue
we don't want them to not see the warning.
If somebody has a whitespace issue they should get a warning. They
should be doing a scan before commit, and they should generally take
the time to fix the issue, even though it is just style. What is the
point in having a style guideline if half of us are just going to
ignore warnings related to it. That doesn't mean that our style
guidelines have to be over-the-top - the solution to that is to drop
requirements that aren't important, not to hide them.
If somebody wants to come up with a bunch of extra optional repoman
warnings for stuff like style, I think their time would be better
spent coming up with an ebuild pretty-printer or something which just
fixes things instead of whining about things that aren't policy.
Ultimately quality has to be something we invest in for each other's
sake. If a rule isn't really benefiting anybody, then it doesn't
belong. Within reason good style helps us all out - bash doesn't care
if the whole ebuild fits on one line with all the phases/variables/etc
in semi-random order, but we impose some sane style so that we can
work in the tree and not rip our eyes out.
--
Rich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-12 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-10 12:22 [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings Sergei Trofimovich
2014-08-11 20:34 ` Bertrand Jacquin
2014-08-12 18:32 ` Michał Górny
2014-08-12 1:48 ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12 1:59 ` Manuel Rüger
2014-08-12 2:42 ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12 4:20 ` Tyler Pohl
2014-08-12 5:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2014-08-12 11:33 ` Alex Xu
2014-08-12 12:47 ` [gentoo-dev] " hasufell
2014-08-12 13:26 ` Rich Freeman
2014-08-12 14:26 ` hasufell
2014-08-12 16:24 ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12 18:37 ` Chris Reffett
2014-08-12 21:08 ` hasufell
2014-08-12 13:54 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 14:04 ` [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 16:36 ` Rich Freeman
2014-08-12 16:57 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 17:08 ` hasufell
2014-08-12 17:13 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 17:25 ` Rich Freeman [this message]
2014-08-12 17:46 ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12 19:01 ` Michał Górny
2014-08-12 19:11 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-13 8:47 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-08-12 18:46 ` [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings Michał Górny
2014-08-18 14:10 ` Ben de Groot
2014-08-13 8:38 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-08-13 16:36 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2014-08-12 22:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alexander Berntsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGfcS_nkqY243x36svwVXdXiMr653JbJxEUhkd_xX=da9-RFoQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rich0@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox