public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings )
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:11:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53EA66D1.7070307@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140812210121.0d2b52ca@pomiot.lan>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 12/08/14 03:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58 Ian Stakenvicius <axs@gentoo.org>
> napisał(a):
>> On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>> 
>>> Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level
>>>  (something that can be quieted with a flag) for things like
>>> this? In terms of DESCRIPTION consistency I don't see it being
>>> a bad thing that we have the warning, but i also don't see a
>>> point in changing the entire tree to get rid of 3000 bytes,
>>> esp. since the ChangeLog entries added to the tree will add at
>>> least 30,000 bytes :)
>>> 
>> 
>> I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to 
>> repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related
>> repoman 'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning?  IIRC at least one
>> of the QA team members is so tired of the warnings that they want
>> to make every single one of them errors; the --nonag option would
>> allow those warnings to remain in repoman (ie to help guide new
>> dev's or non-dev's using repoman on their local repos) but since
>> they don't relate to actual technical breakage they can just be
>> turned off during QA runs, etc.
> 
> Just don't. I think you missed the point hard and I don't want to
> know where the ricochet ended.

The ricochet more or less ended with the notion that repoman shouldn't
be a random style guide, or rather, development time is better spent
elsewhere rather than making it into one -- and so there's no use case
for "nag" level messages and a flag that would disable them.


> Thirdly, I'm pretty sure I had a third argument but I forgot what
> it was. But it was totally convincing, I'm sure of it.

Yep, that one was definitely the clincher.  you've convinced me! :)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iF4EAREIAAYFAlPqZtEACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCDBAD/WJQ8JBPnYD5XuqTMqHygYd5L
K24oZzyhAsR1vkSahhgBAIW+hia5MXJd4T4AD8u9hi4xzdxGg/2xpwlYMs0u9VQ8
=vQMn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-12 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-10 12:22 [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings Sergei Trofimovich
2014-08-11 20:34 ` Bertrand Jacquin
2014-08-12 18:32   ` Michał Górny
2014-08-12  1:48 ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12  1:59   ` Manuel Rüger
2014-08-12  2:42     ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12  4:20       ` Tyler Pohl
2014-08-12  5:29         ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2014-08-12 11:33           ` Alex Xu
2014-08-12 12:47       ` [gentoo-dev] " hasufell
2014-08-12 13:26         ` Rich Freeman
2014-08-12 14:26           ` hasufell
2014-08-12 16:24           ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12 18:37           ` Chris Reffett
2014-08-12 21:08             ` hasufell
2014-08-12 13:54         ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 14:04           ` [gentoo-dev] repoman --nonag (was Re: gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings ) Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 16:36             ` Rich Freeman
2014-08-12 16:57               ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 17:08                 ` hasufell
2014-08-12 17:13                   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2014-08-12 17:25                     ` Rich Freeman
2014-08-12 17:46                       ` William Hubbs
2014-08-12 19:01             ` Michał Górny
2014-08-12 19:11               ` Ian Stakenvicius [this message]
2014-08-13  8:47             ` Tom Wijsman
2014-08-12 18:46   ` [gentoo-dev] gentoo-x86 tree cleanup for 'DESCRIPTION ends with a '.' character' warnings Michał Górny
2014-08-18 14:10     ` Ben de Groot
2014-08-13  8:38   ` Tom Wijsman
2014-08-13 16:36     ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2014-08-12 22:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Alexander Berntsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53EA66D1.7070307@gentoo.org \
    --to=axs@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox