From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays?
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 12:28:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DB2A9CD.7010708@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB26C3C.8090602@gentoo.org>
Eray Aslan schrieb:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364445
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364401
>
> Basically, there are requests to add packages to RDEPEND in virtual/mda
> and virtual/mta that are not in the official tree but in sunrise.
>
> On one side, *DEPENDing on a package outside the tree doesn't seem
> right.
I understand that the push to remove old-style virtuals from the main
tree is because they cause headaches for the package managers during
dependency calculation. I also understand that existing EAPIs will not
be amended to forbid old-style virtuals.
Would it make sense to do the following:
(1) make all new-style virtuals additionally depend on an old-style
virtual (a new category might be appropriate)
(2) ebuilds in overlays can PROVIDE the old-style virtual
(3) in a future EAPI, package managers are allowed to ignore the
old-style virtual dependency for packages which are not already installed
If directly including installed old-style virtual packages in the
dependency calculations is not feasible, (3) could be implemented
through modifying package.provided like it is already done for
package.{keywords,mask,use} after profile/ updates
Regards,
Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-23 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-23 6:05 [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Eray Aslan
2011-04-23 10:28 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn [this message]
2011-04-23 11:15 ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: " Zac Medico
2011-04-23 13:25 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:32 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 13:28 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 13:37 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 14:47 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 14:57 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 15:50 ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-23 16:02 ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Zac Medico
2011-04-23 12:01 ` Nathan Phillip Brink
2011-04-23 12:07 ` Thomas Sachau
2011-04-23 12:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 13:05 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-23 15:24 ` Zac Medico
2011-04-24 4:57 ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-24 5:39 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-24 6:42 ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-24 20:35 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-23 11:03 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-23 13:07 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego Elio Pettenò
2011-04-23 11:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 11:59 ` Thomas Sachau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DB2A9CD.7010708@gentoo.org \
--to=chithanh@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox