public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays?
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 13:08:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1303556888.2367.22.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DB26C3C.8090602@gentoo.org>

Il giorno sab, 23/04/2011 alle 09.05 +0300, Eray Aslan ha scritto:
> 
> On one side, *DEPENDing on a package outside the tree doesn't seem
> right.  Additionally, keeping track of all the overlays and their
> package versions, USE flags and flag changes are potentially too much
> to
> track.  We will be making changes to a virtual package without testing
> whether it works.

Okay this is tricky.

From one side, we've done this before. Do note: we are _not_ going to
accept forced or non-use-masked dependencies for packages that are not
in tree, but || () dependencies on non-existing packages have been used
before, for instance while Gentoo/FreeBSD was still in its original
development.

On the other hand handling the current new-style virtual mess is enough
of a task without having to bend over backward to overlays.

As long as _somebody_ feels like doing the work, I suppose it's fine.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-04-23 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-23  6:05 [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Eray Aslan
2011-04-23 10:28 ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: " Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:15   ` Zac Medico
2011-04-23 13:25     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:32   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 13:28     ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 13:37       ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 14:47         ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 14:57           ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 15:50             ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-23 16:02             ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Zac Medico
2011-04-23 12:01   ` Nathan Phillip Brink
2011-04-23 12:07   ` Thomas Sachau
2011-04-23 12:08     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 13:05     ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-23 15:24       ` Zac Medico
2011-04-24  4:57         ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-24  5:39           ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-24  6:42             ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-24 20:35               ` William Hubbs
2011-04-23 11:03 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-23 13:07   ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:08 ` Diego Elio Pettenò [this message]
2011-04-23 11:34 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 11:59 ` Thomas Sachau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1303556888.2367.22.camel@raven.home.flameeyes.eu \
    --to=flameeyes@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox