From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays?
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:39:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19891.47019.966218.486240@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110424045717.GA2902@zptr-nb18>
>>>>> On Sun, 24 Apr 2011, Eray Aslan wrote:
> The consensus seems to be to leave it for the package maintainer to
> decide.
> I, for one, will be making the necessary changes to include packages
> from overlays until, for whatever reason, it either
> * becomes too burdensome
> * hinders the main tree
I can live with that, as long as the responsibility that packages work
with dependencies from overlays stays entirely with the overlay's
maintainer.
But could you please add a comment in the virtual's ebuild where (i.e.
in which overlay) the additional dependencies can be found?
Ulrich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-24 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-23 6:05 [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Eray Aslan
2011-04-23 10:28 ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: " Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:15 ` Zac Medico
2011-04-23 13:25 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:32 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 13:28 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 13:37 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 14:47 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 14:57 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 15:50 ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-23 16:02 ` [gentoo-dev] reconciling new-style virtuals with overlays, was: RDEPENDing on packages from overlays? Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:02 ` [gentoo-dev] " Zac Medico
2011-04-23 12:01 ` Nathan Phillip Brink
2011-04-23 12:07 ` Thomas Sachau
2011-04-23 12:08 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 13:05 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-23 15:24 ` Zac Medico
2011-04-24 4:57 ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-24 5:39 ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]
2011-04-24 6:42 ` Eray Aslan
2011-04-24 20:35 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-23 11:03 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-23 13:07 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2011-04-23 11:08 ` [gentoo-dev] " Diego Elio Pettenò
2011-04-23 11:34 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-23 11:59 ` Thomas Sachau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19891.47019.966218.486240@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de \
--to=ulm@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox