From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES use or misuse?
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:11:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091103181139.70a13d6b@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200911032328.57477.patrick@gentoo.org
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 828 bytes --]
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:28:57 +0100
Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> wrote:
> And then why bother when the tree doesn't reflect PMS.
Maybe if some people would stop ignoring PMS on whim because they don't agree
with something in it this wouldn't be the case.
Like, when does this end? Whenever there's a policy you don't agree with,
you do whatever you want? And it's the policy that's the problem?
I don't get it.
Anyways, this has nothing to do with PMS. Using FEATURES in the tree was
frowned upon long before it even existed. The fact that it wasn't documented
as such outside of mailing lists and bug reports is the real bug.
--
fonts, Character is what you are in the dark.
gcc-porting,
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-04 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 15:48 [gentoo-dev] FEATURES use or misuse? Patrick Lauer
2009-11-03 17:27 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-11-03 20:36 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-11-03 20:58 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-03 22:28 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-11-04 0:11 ` Ryan Hill [this message]
2009-11-04 8:26 ` [gentoo-dev] " Patrick Lauer
2009-11-05 1:36 ` Ryan Hill
2009-11-05 4:56 ` [gentoo-dev] a pragmatic approach to FEATURES [was FEATURES use or misuse?] Brian Harring
2009-11-05 8:49 ` Thilo Bangert
2009-11-05 9:36 ` Brian Harring
2009-11-08 9:21 ` Thilo Bangert
2009-11-03 21:26 ` [gentoo-dev] FEATURES use or misuse? Alexis Ballier
2009-11-03 22:04 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-11-03 22:26 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-11-04 0:33 ` Sebastian Pipping
2009-11-04 8:26 ` Patrick Lauer
2009-11-03 23:04 ` David Leverton
2009-11-04 1:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2009-11-04 22:12 ` Peter Hjalmarsson
2009-11-05 5:04 ` Brian Harring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091103181139.70a13d6b@gentoo.org \
--to=dirtyepic@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox