From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5TSu-0002gB-6m for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:11:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26A55E0A89; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D04E0A89 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4B766DF1 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:11:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.054 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.054 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.314, BAYES_20=-0.74] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ILFxkF-Zil37 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F0A667A9 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 00:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1N5TSg-0002V6-JR for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:10:54 +0100 Received: from 64-201-202-141.regn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([64.201.202.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:10:54 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic by 64-201-202-141.regn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:10:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Ryan Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: FEATURES use or misuse? Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:11:39 -0600 Message-ID: <20091103181139.70a13d6b@gentoo.org> References: <200911031648.04090.patrick@gentoo.org> <200911032136.18242.patrick@gentoo.org> <20091103205827.339c1613@snowcone> <200911032328.57477.patrick@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/tcGcCGx70rnqY6sKxR6lbYj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64-201-202-141.regn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.18.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 25d0e375-2681-4cca-a7a7-c9e506e196fb X-Archives-Hash: d349a24c2af32d2835de027536a51c96 --Sig_/tcGcCGx70rnqY6sKxR6lbYj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:28:57 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote: > And then why bother when the tree doesn't reflect PMS. Maybe if some people would stop ignoring PMS on whim because they don't agr= ee with something in it this wouldn't be the case. Like, when does this end? Whenever there's a policy you don't agree with, you do whatever you want? And it's the policy that's the problem? I don't get it. Anyways, this has nothing to do with PMS. Using FEATURES in the tree was frowned upon long before it even existed. The fact that it wasn't document= ed as such outside of mailing lists and bug reports is the real bug. --=20 fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. gcc-porting, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 --Sig_/tcGcCGx70rnqY6sKxR6lbYj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrwxr8ACgkQiqiDRvmkBmLjxACgvd0TGudro3wZGmd0cxUKugL1 9yYAoKmx4tfbHxa35SKQbxA2wpuWJ5i6 =iyKD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tcGcCGx70rnqY6sKxR6lbYj--