* [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass
@ 2022-12-25 12:09 David Seifert
2022-12-25 15:40 ` Michael Orlitzky
2022-12-26 8:43 ` Hans de Graaff
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Seifert @ 2022-12-25 12:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev-announce; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 196 bytes --]
Back when polynomial-c was retired, we forgot to send up for grabs for
eclasses he maintained:
apache-2.eclass
is up for grabs, and is in general need of a revamp, it hasn't aged
well.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass
2022-12-25 12:09 [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass David Seifert
@ 2022-12-25 15:40 ` Michael Orlitzky
2022-12-26 9:11 ` Hans de Graaff
2022-12-26 8:43 ` Hans de Graaff
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Orlitzky @ 2022-12-25 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 2022-12-25 13:09:46, David Seifert wrote:
> Back when polynomial-c was retired, we forgot to send up for grabs for
> eclasses he maintained:
>
> apache-2.eclass
>
> is up for grabs, and is in general need of a revamp, it hasn't aged
> well.
If anyone is interested, I posted updates/replacements for the other
two apache eclasses on https://bugs.gentoo.org/616612. Merging those
should ideally be accompanied by an update to apache-2.eclass, making
it use the paths from the new apache-paths.eclass, so that everyone is
getting the paths from the same place.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass
2022-12-25 15:40 ` Michael Orlitzky
@ 2022-12-26 9:11 ` Hans de Graaff
2022-12-28 21:20 ` Michael Orlitzky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Graaff @ 2022-12-26 9:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 763 bytes --]
On Sun, 2022-12-25 at 10:40 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> If anyone is interested, I posted updates/replacements for the other
> two apache eclasses on https://bugs.gentoo.org/616612. Merging those
> should ideally be accompanied by an update to apache-2.eclass, making
> it use the paths from the new apache-paths.eclass, so that everyone
> is
> getting the paths from the same place.
It would be great if you could dust these off and post them here so we
can get these improvements merged. You mention in the bug that you'd
rather wait for a dedicated maintainer to review them, but I'm (in
name) that maintainer and I think you probably know these eclasses
better than I do. With some joint effort we may get things moving here.
Hans
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass
2022-12-26 9:11 ` Hans de Graaff
@ 2022-12-28 21:20 ` Michael Orlitzky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Orlitzky @ 2022-12-28 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 2022-12-26 10:11:18, Hans de Graaff wrote:
>
> It would be great if you could dust these off and post them here so we
> can get these improvements merged. You mention in the bug that you'd
> rather wait for a dedicated maintainer to review them, but I'm (in
> name) that maintainer and I think you probably know these eclasses
> better than I do. With some joint effort we may get things moving here.
I'm trying to avoid becoming the de facto maintainer of the thirty or
so apache modules that I care nothing about. The eclasses I posted to
the bug are a proof-of-concept for www-apache/mpm_itk, but even that
has a workaround allowing it to use EAPI=7 now. I haven't tested them
with any other packages.
Updating apache-module-r1.eclass to EAPI=8 still requires some work,
and then the whole thing needs to be tested by migrating a
representative chunk of apache-module packages to determine if the
idea is feasible as-is, or if the approach needs to be tweaked. Until
then we'd just be wasting reviewers' time.
I may eventually get bored enough to do all that testing, but right
now I have a lot of things that are actually enjoyable and/or make me
money in front of it on my list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass
2022-12-25 12:09 [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass David Seifert
2022-12-25 15:40 ` Michael Orlitzky
@ 2022-12-26 8:43 ` Hans de Graaff
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Graaff @ 2022-12-26 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 472 bytes --]
On Sun, 2022-12-25 at 13:09 +0100, David Seifert wrote:
> Back when polynomial-c was retired, we forgot to send up for grabs
> for
> eclasses he maintained:
>
> apache-2.eclass
>
> is up for grabs, and is in general need of a revamp, it hasn't aged
> well.
Given that this eclass is only used by the www-servers/apache ebuilds
I'd think it would be obvious who maintains it. I've updated the
MAINTAINER and AUTHOR in the eclass to reflect that.
Hans
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-28 21:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-25 12:09 [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: apache-2.eclass David Seifert
2022-12-25 15:40 ` Michael Orlitzky
2022-12-26 9:11 ` Hans de Graaff
2022-12-28 21:20 ` Michael Orlitzky
2022-12-26 8:43 ` Hans de Graaff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox