public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system
  @ 2005-04-21 19:09 99%   ` Juha Varkki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Juha Varkki @ 2005-04-21 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

bc? Do you mean /usr/bin/bc or did I miss something?
Why on earth are you taking it out?
I use bc quite often actually ..

-- Juha Varkki / dbg

On 4/21/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:06:57 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> | we've had 'bc' and 'ed' around for historical reasons and because
> | we've never  actually tracked what packages invoke 'bc' or 'ed' in
> | their scripts
> 
> Anyone still using ed-style patches rather than context or unified
> diffs?
> 
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
> Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
> Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
> 
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-21 17:06     [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system Mike Frysinger
2005-04-21 17:17     ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-21 19:09 99%   ` Juha Varkki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox