From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3LJ9AXp003850
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 19:09:11 GMT
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so697209wra
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=dL/uF8An3Vk5nfELAryXp1Ztemz64t3Y7WBEcaPhQIuhmOalcPH7LgVbxjTBt2bWvDLpi6KgtWGQPiZP5OXInPtt3IRlkQLPDbiB2IKiyuiU4asbsTaBXSBadzgcwFKhN0WJneeA1GZxmLuk8fRbndJgDfkm0Hh7KVruTO1L2Ss=
Received: by 10.54.151.6 with SMTP id y6mr1845wrd;
        Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.95.17 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2005 12:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <31cfb4d00504211209117bf4e5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:09:16 +0300
From: Juha Varkki <dbg.64b@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system
In-Reply-To: <20050421181719.443a292b@snowdrop>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200504211306.57424.vapier@gentoo.org>
	 <20050421181719.443a292b@snowdrop>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j3LJ9AXp003850
X-Archives-Salt: f53d935c-afa7-4df4-8f58-62b3f6751e46
X-Archives-Hash: 9f61d8e464175e250831b804cf9fb1ba

bc? Do you mean /usr/bin/bc or did I miss something?
Why on earth are you taking it out?
I use bc quite often actually ..

-- Juha Varkki / dbg

On 4/21/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:06:57 -0400 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> | we've had 'bc' and 'ed' around for historical reasons and because
> | we've never  actually tracked what packages invoke 'bc' or 'ed' in
> | their scripts
> 
> Anyone still using ed-style patches rather than context or unified
> diffs?
> 
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, shell tools)
> Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
> Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
> 
> 
>

-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list