* Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item
@ 2011-04-29 17:58 99% ` Alex Alexander
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Alex Alexander @ 2011-04-29 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:52:15PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Alex Alexander wrote:
> >
> >> please have a look at the attached patch.
> >
> >> -EAPI="1"
> >> +EAPI="4"
> >
> > Shouldn't the ebuild's phase functions be updated from "EAPI 0 style"
> > to "EAPI 2 style" too?
>
> If the goal is to get this stable in a week, and bypass the 1 month
> waiting period, do we really want to change EAPI at this point? From
> an end-user perspective updating the EAPI on the ebuild provides no
> benefit. Why not just deal with that in a future revision?
>
> I don't see much value in rewriting the ebuild to use a new EAPI
> simply because 4 > 1.
EAPI was bumped so I could use pkg_pretend, please check out my
(incomplete) patch.
--
Alex Alexander | wired
+ Gentoo Linux Developer
++ www.linuxized.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-04-13 18:15 [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item William Hubbs
2011-04-29 7:08 ` William Hubbs
2011-04-29 11:21 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 11:28 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2011-04-29 17:18 ` Alex Alexander
2011-04-29 17:25 ` Ulrich Mueller
2011-04-29 17:52 ` Rich Freeman
2011-04-29 17:58 99% ` Alex Alexander
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox