From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QFrwQ-0002U3-Hp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:57:22 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F2CE1C06F; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37E51C032 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so4040120wyi.40 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:56:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2bqSGzgwKe5Li8nz7w1W5u50JTpOhjGUdskbBrPNrh0=; b=moEuDjKF+7OUHD6DF+qtj5ArJXpYcBCKQxsnqaNEv45wBk77SHo6t5XR85htXAMrxw yksOjGWk7a9pCouHZRvWfu/SsdPl+0jlkN1OslZjYHVDG1vmR4iQP2TGI3NtQGu+79BY PKzYw4BboaF9s3jwYkiTqTUNllbWUjvowRCyc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=kVElIbNMrpW2bRSKE+QUdkgSPiyifxz3nasSwX8p1fozEI0STOA5YU4UUWliROXNtx BdcNtTESDFuN6sk5hEFHNbvNgSzS5cd8baGIG7gSlDZjodcOzv15E5wUWjevuRk9SbtB UuVRZfMgLoJcDRabj5PVmeEtFMD5dGshHBY6c= Received: by 10.216.30.206 with SMTP id k56mr974249wea.23.1304099808992; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lust (ppp079166174138.dsl.hol.gr [79.166.174.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o23sm1843340wbc.27.2011.04.29.10.56.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Alex Alexander Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 20:58:31 +0300 From: Alex Alexander To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc portage news item Message-ID: <20110429175831.GB11073@lust> References: <20110413181538.GA2894@linux1> <20110429070831.GA27531@linux1> <20110429122803.0ecc8060@googlemail.com> <20110429171825.GA5451@lust> <19898.62584.6075.983954@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 477b9ca726ab7dcbabb8ed96c8d3a826 --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 01:52:15PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>>> On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Alex Alexander wrote: > > > >> please have a look at the attached patch. > > > >> -EAPI=3D"1" > >> +EAPI=3D"4" > > > > Shouldn't the ebuild's phase functions be updated from "EAPI 0 style" > > to "EAPI 2 style" too? >=20 > If the goal is to get this stable in a week, and bypass the 1 month > waiting period, do we really want to change EAPI at this point? From > an end-user perspective updating the EAPI on the ebuild provides no > benefit. Why not just deal with that in a future revision? >=20 > I don't see much value in rewriting the ebuild to use a new EAPI > simply because 4 > 1. EAPI was bumped so I could use pkg_pretend, please check out my (incomplete) patch. --=20 Alex Alexander | wired + Gentoo Linux Developer ++ www.linuxized.com --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNuvxHAAoJEDZF8K7rm0r6BSoP+gKkC1BOLxhtvqflVz1kOAX6 d2cV293jR0iAxPs5xXdvJJFilV0a+gD5dG8BqN4AKY/+w1mb44YedUfG8q7HVUTx zIiTAb1rKphz+J6gKCYp6MoAbUC3S+Jf/gNMgTCJYUT8m2EHPuFBUnXamU1phK9b mfU4gNFQcxr2hy6Q6Ztd4wRJ3Cz/A2xos3Ic6YFG4EC8NPDajKz7tutMrWGXYs4V RoNx995b5vEjdxUAbHp218fyKcC2CJDESboRVG0zuaaGG0sUuuNeoJLI0it4ew6X jnJx9rbzA6XyzfkUgZbu6JryT2p/ROVC9h8RFtNPOqpRMrUr4bZxOuvRldU2MUsL 5NjkmBBUBFsPct5lgxCms8YfFS+YYb63CahBwxOerGZfGwoaew1AyV/XGpmKlrgS p+0hNACdgXewMY80MgSy3CQawaHJS1ftj+QD7IylGykhb9i+OWQYYejsVWiuiPVe L+tEDxkCCdMNV8po6ek8Dekwl4Vft0QOSAfoUOrwMMLE7ORGj1rYWTy+gI/3vsjY I5PTFy1CH9b+xBnrmvzWljs2Yc8b8ZV+vFeVfOC1ZOWyp6A9XFa1i9AQx8gErhBa /rYX1cXcR5LQqWwIe1hctSMCQRDo449O6skHKYKa0wCB8GYd+BlBICr6JVYJe9w8 17/2hIs3z+9SwxnpPSP3 =U81o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vGgW1X5XWziG23Ko--