* Re: [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead?
@ 2013-12-10 21:06 99% ` Ian Stakenvicius
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ian Stakenvicius @ 2013-12-10 21:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 08/12/13 03:21 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:01:00 +0100 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>
>>> Sure it does - it defaults to :* when :* was never specified.
>>> I don't see how defaulting to :0= is a "policy" any more than
>>> :* is.
>>
>> Defaulting to :* is just the long term behaviour from EAPIs 0 to
>> 4 when no slot operator was specified.
>
> Which section in the PMS is this specified?
>
>> This is consistent with what we haved for versioned
>> dependencies. When you don't specify a version, then all versions
>> are good.
>
> Good idea.
>
>> Similarly, when you don't specify a slot, then all slots are
>> good.
>
> Not so good idea; because if all slot would be good by default,
> then why have slots in the first place? Are we using SLOT right at
> all?
>
SLOT allows multiple versions of a package to be installed
concurrently. In the case of libraries or dependencies, this supports
the specific case where certain ebuilds only support a particular
SLOT. However, that doesn't mean that all packages need to be tied to
one slot or another.
It should be noted here that this discussion is revolving entirely
around multi-SLOT libraries. Firstly, there are packages like
dev-db/postgresql that use SLOTs not just for library provision.
Secondly, SLOT= on the libraries being discussed may not actually be
the correct method to deal with this at all, and rather, these libs
should be using a subslot and the rdeps be using an upper-bound
version on dependency atoms to limit which dependency it can be used
with--it all depends on whether the library maintainer intends to
support both major versions in the long term or not.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iF4EAREIAAYFAlKngmsACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCfxwD/YifeWm+rrAN1om9HP41ATO6Z
pqKChxQaayjzfWtKyeMA/2K9AJFvhowBSKHBatAilfWGuI2L25dMHFidOxzLpZX3
=KW2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-12-08 16:56 [gentoo-dev] Dependencies default to accept any slot value acceptable (:*), can we default to :0 instead? Tom Wijsman
2013-12-08 17:19 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-12-08 19:14 ` Ulrich Mueller
2013-12-08 19:39 ` Rich Freeman
2013-12-08 20:01 ` Ulrich Mueller
2013-12-08 20:21 ` Tom Wijsman
2013-12-10 21:06 99% ` Ian Stakenvicius
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox