public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:51:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090302175107.GD5295@comet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090302115515.TA82c8a.tv@veller.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1576 bytes --]

On 13:08 Mon 02 Mar     , Torsten Veller wrote:
> Currently the eclass doesn't set any dependencies. If it is used the 
> ebuild has to depend on perl if needed.
> 
> 
> I see the following options:
> 
> 1) Don't add DEPEND to the eclass.
>    So if a package is used for stage-building we have to raise EAPI and
>    depend on dev-lang/perl[-build] in the ebuild.
> 
>    The part I don't understand in the bug above is:
>    Does adding dev-lang/perl[-build] automagically reinstall
>    perl during stage-building
>    (here portage stops and complains).
> 
> 
> 2) Add DEPEND conditionally to the eclass.
>    To give ebuilds the chance to inherit perl-module.eclass
>    (and currently also perl-app.eclass) and support perl conditionally,
>    we have to add another global variable to check it.
> 
>    (Checking CATEGORY and perl? probably could be added additonally)
> 
> 
> 3) Add DEPEND.
>    Always depend on dev-lang/perl and 
>    if EAPI=2 then depend on dev-lang/perl[-build]
> 
> 
> Comments?

Having not spent a lot of time thinking about this, I'm guessing the use 
case of concern is packages that have an optional perl module always 
pulling in dev-lang/perl. This would apparently be relevant on an 
embedded system that lacked perl but required a package with an optional 
perl module. To handle that miniscule use case, I'd tend to go with a 
conditional variable (GENTOO_PERL="no"?) that defaults to "yes".

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-02 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 14:08 [gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass -- review Torsten Veller
2009-02-28 11:28 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2 Torsten Veller
2009-03-02  3:34   ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-03-02  7:24     ` Torsten Veller
2009-03-02 12:01       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2009-03-03 11:13         ` Peter Volkov
2009-03-03 13:09           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2009-03-09  1:50             ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-03-09  8:02               ` Rémi Cardona
2009-03-02  6:56 ` [gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass -- review Robin H. Johnson
2009-03-02 12:08   ` [gentoo-dev] " Torsten Veller
2009-03-02 17:51     ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2009-03-02 18:13       ` Robin H. Johnson
2009-03-05 14:47         ` [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 3 Torsten Veller
2009-03-02 18:10     ` [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review Robin H. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090302175107.GD5295@comet \
    --to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox