public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:13:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090302181306.GP16405@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090302175107.GD5295@comet>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1181 bytes --]

On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 09:51:07AM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 13:08 Mon 02 Mar     , Torsten Veller wrote:
> > Currently the eclass doesn't set any dependencies. If it is used the 
> > ebuild has to depend on perl if needed.
> > 
> > 
> > I see the following options:
Perl modules by definition need dev-lang/perl installed to build
(Makefile.PL is written in Perl).

How many Perl modules can be installed with a Perl that is built with
USE=build?

> Having not spent a lot of time thinking about this, I'm guessing the use 
> case of concern is packages that have an optional perl module always 
> pulling in dev-lang/perl. This would apparently be relevant on an 
> embedded system that lacked perl but required a package with an optional 
> perl module. To handle that miniscule use case, I'd tend to go with a 
> conditional variable (GENTOO_PERL="no"?) that defaults to "yes".
Yes, this would be needed in any case, similar to how it's done for
stuff that had optional X dependencies.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy
E-Mail     : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP   : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED  F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 330 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-02 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 14:08 [gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass -- review Torsten Veller
2009-02-28 11:28 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 2 Torsten Veller
2009-03-02  3:34   ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-03-02  7:24     ` Torsten Veller
2009-03-02 12:01       ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2009-03-03 11:13         ` Peter Volkov
2009-03-03 13:09           ` Bo Ørsted Andresen
2009-03-09  1:50             ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-03-09  8:02               ` Rémi Cardona
2009-03-02  6:56 ` [gentoo-dev] perl-module.eclass -- review Robin H. Johnson
2009-03-02 12:08   ` [gentoo-dev] " Torsten Veller
2009-03-02 17:51     ` Donnie Berkholz
2009-03-02 18:13       ` Robin H. Johnson [this message]
2009-03-05 14:47         ` [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review - 3 Torsten Veller
2009-03-02 18:10     ` [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass -- review Robin H. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090302181306.GP16405@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net \
    --to=robbat2@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox