Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI change: Call ebuild functions from trusted working directory

["Wulf C. Krueger" <wk@mailstation.de>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 831 bytes --]

On Monday, 13. October 2008 19:42:21 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Since EAPI=0 isn't actually approved yet, council wouldn't vote 
> either. As it's a draft standard, this would be resolved amongst
> package-manager developers and PMS editors.

So, EAPI-2 had to be approved before it could be used in the tree. EAPI-0 
isn't "actually approved yet", though, so it must not be used in the tree, 
right? ;-)

And since EAPI-1 builds upon EAPI-0, that's not acceptable in the tree 
either.

(And, btw, the former council decided there wouldn't be any new EAPIs 
before EAPI-0 wasn't approved.)

While I agree with your intention of letting people decide upon the stuff 
they have to work with mostly on their own and with each other, I think 
your argument, Donnie, is rather "interesting". :-)

Best regards, Wulf


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2184 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]