public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Buchholz <rbu@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: council@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI change: Call ebuild functions from trusted working directory
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 13:36:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200810241336.59773.rbu@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810170241.43081.rbu@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]

On Friday 17 October 2008, Robert Buchholz wrote:
> On Monday 13 October 2008, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > It's a retroactive change to EAPI 0 that requires changes from
> > package managers and has security implications... Robert isn't
> > requesting that we specify and mandate existing behaviour here, so
> > it's not really something that should be left up to PMS to decide
> > and enforce.
>
> All package manager developers have implemented this change, and PMS
> editors have not objected to adding it to the spec. If Ciaran is
> uncomfortable with adding this change, I would like council to sign
> off on it. If council will not add this to the agenda, please state
> so and I hope the PMS folks can add it to the spec without a vote.
>
> Furthermore, what are the blockers to vote on PMS as a draft standard
> for EAPI=0 ? Is there a timeframe for its ratification?

Has this been discussed in the last council meeting?
If not, can you please give a reply for the questions above?


Robert

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2008-10-24 11:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-09 19:03 [gentoo-dev] EAPI change: Call ebuild functions from trusted working directory Robert Buchholz
2008-10-13 17:42 ` Donnie Berkholz
2008-10-13 18:20   ` Wulf C. Krueger
2008-10-13 18:56     ` Donnie Berkholz
2008-10-13 18:28   ` Ciaran McCreesh
2008-10-17  0:41     ` Robert Buchholz
2008-10-24 11:36       ` Robert Buchholz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200810241336.59773.rbu@gentoo.org \
    --to=rbu@gentoo.org \
    --cc=council@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox