* [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring
@ 2006-10-01 20:41 Stuart Herbert
2006-10-01 21:16 ` Nick Devito
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stuart Herbert @ 2006-10-01 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Hi,
One of the things that the LAMP Server seed will install will be
something to do automatic server monitoring - CPU, RAM, swap, disk
space, bandwidth, and so on.
I'm a cacti user myself on my own boxes, but I'm interested to hear if
anyone has any strong preference for an alternative tool. I'd prefer
it if the tool we finally choose is SNMP-based, to make it easy for
folks who want to deploy the LAMP Server in a web farm / multi-server
environment.
Please reply to the list naming your favourite tool for this job, and why.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring
2006-10-01 20:41 [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring Stuart Herbert
@ 2006-10-01 21:16 ` Nick Devito
2006-10-02 1:06 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-10-02 5:48 ` Anatoly Shipitsin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Devito @ 2006-10-01 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 21:41 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the things that the LAMP Server seed will install will be
> something to do automatic server monitoring - CPU, RAM, swap, disk
> space, bandwidth, and so on.
>
> I'm a cacti user myself on my own boxes, but I'm interested to hear if
> anyone has any strong preference for an alternative tool. I'd prefer
> it if the tool we finally choose is SNMP-based, to make it easy for
> folks who want to deploy the LAMP Server in a web farm / multi-server
> environment.
>
> Please reply to the list naming your favourite tool for this job, and why.
>
> Best regards,
> Stu
I really like using rrdtool and mrtg, but, those are as user-friendly as
cacti. Cacti is a pretty decent tool though, and, I used to use it
before I switched to mrtg/rrdtool. One reason I use rrdtool in my setup
is because I need custom graphs that cacti can't provide, but, I guess
that in 95% of setups, custom graphs shouldn't be needed. And, I agree
on making it SNMP-based. SNMP is a decent standard, and, its widely used
by routers, servers, and, hell, I think my printer even has a SNMP
server running on it. Thats just my opinion
~ Nick
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring
2006-10-01 20:41 [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring Stuart Herbert
2006-10-01 21:16 ` Nick Devito
@ 2006-10-02 1:06 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-10-02 5:48 ` Anatoly Shipitsin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2006-10-02 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 996 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 09:41:08PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> Please reply to the list naming your favourite tool for this job, and why.
Ok, something is not clear here at all.
Do you intend to provide all statistics via SNMPd (writing agents to
provide the data that net-snmp doesn't provide directly),
OR are you asking about tools that can track data over time, with SNMP
being a supported data source?
I'm interested in solutions to both of these two separate items.
If your seeds can provide SNMP access to all of the data from the system
(after you write the extra agent scripts) - that would help hugely in
integrating them into existing data tracking and monitoring.
For tracking of data, I'm a fan of Munin, as it provides a significantly
simpler interface than cacti, and also offers more security with it's
separation of privileges.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring
2006-10-01 20:41 [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring Stuart Herbert
2006-10-01 21:16 ` Nick Devito
2006-10-02 1:06 ` Robin H. Johnson
@ 2006-10-02 5:48 ` Anatoly Shipitsin
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anatoly Shipitsin @ 2006-10-02 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]
2006/10/2, Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> One of the things that the LAMP Server seed will install will be
> something to do automatic server monitoring - CPU, RAM, swap, disk
> space, bandwidth, and so on.
>
> I'm a cacti user myself on my own boxes, but I'm interested to hear if
> anyone has any strong preference for an alternative tool. I'd prefer
> it if the tool we finally choose is SNMP-based, to make it easy for
> folks who want to deploy the LAMP Server in a web farm / multi-server
> environment.
May try zabbix (zabbix.com)? It's can get data from our agents, snmp,
trappers and etc more. It's can alert and create useful graphs.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 987 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-02 5:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-01 20:41 [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring Stuart Herbert
2006-10-01 21:16 ` Nick Devito
2006-10-02 1:06 ` Robin H. Johnson
2006-10-02 5:48 ` Anatoly Shipitsin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox