public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] emerge rsync obsolete?
@ 2003-05-11 11:27 Sven Vermeulen
  2003-05-13 19:31 ` Grant Goodyear
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sven Vermeulen @ 2003-05-11 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: gentoo-docs-review

Hi,

I'm planning on substituting every "emerge rsync" I can find in the docs to
"emerge sync". Is there *any* reason why I should not do it?

AFAIK is Portage 2.0.47-r10 stable on all supported architectures and
2.0.47-r10 has /usr/bin/emerge with "sync" being the same as "rsync":

[...]
                if x[2:]=="rsync":
                    #print
                    #print red("*** --rsync has been deprecated.")
                    #print red("***   Please use '--sync' instead.")
                    x="--sync"
[...]
            if x=="rsync":
                #print red("***   Please use '--sync' instead.")
                x="sync"
[...]
if myaction in ["sync","rsync"] and (not "--help" in myopts):
[...]


Wkr,
	Sven Vermeulen

PS CC'd to gentoo-docs-review as requested by the Gentoo Documentation Policy

-- 
Thanks to DRM, you know that something has been built in environment of 
unspecified degree of security, from source you cannot check, written by 
programmers you don't know, released after passing QA of unknown quality and 
which is released under a license that disclaims any responsibility...

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge rsync obsolete?
  2003-05-11 11:27 [gentoo-dev] emerge rsync obsolete? Sven Vermeulen
@ 2003-05-13 19:31 ` Grant Goodyear
  2003-05-14  8:56   ` Ian Phillips
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Grant Goodyear @ 2003-05-13 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: gentoo-docs-review, carpaski

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 440 bytes --]

Bless you for changing the docs.  Nick, after 1.4 comes out would it be
reasonable to switch the behavior of "emerge rsync" over to actually
emerging the rsync program?

-g2boojum- 

On Sun, 2003-05-11 at 07:27, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm planning on substituting every "emerge rsync" I can find in the docs to
> "emerge sync". Is there *any* reason why I should not do it?

-- 
Grant Goodyear <g2boojum@gentoo.org>

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge rsync obsolete?
  2003-05-13 19:31 ` Grant Goodyear
@ 2003-05-14  8:56   ` Ian Phillips
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Phillips @ 2003-05-14  8:56 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Grant Goodyear; +Cc: gentoo-dev

> Bless you for changing the docs.  Nick, after 1.4 comes out would it be
> reasonable to switch the behavior of "emerge rsync" over to actually
> emerging the rsync program?

Seems reasonable. Maybe for the 1.4 release it might make sense to put
in a disclaimer on the rsync ebuild notifying the user of the new
behaviour. Kind of like Evolution 1.3.x uses at the moment (short
message and 5 second sleep).

Cheers,
Ian.

-- 
#ifndef  __COMMON_SENSE__ | Ian Phillips
#include <std_disclaimer> | TIBCO Software Inc.
#endif                    | www.tibco.com




--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-14  9:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-11 11:27 [gentoo-dev] emerge rsync obsolete? Sven Vermeulen
2003-05-13 19:31 ` Grant Goodyear
2003-05-14  8:56   ` Ian Phillips

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox