public inbox for www-redesign@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Case <macguyvok@gmail.com>
To: www-redesign@robin.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [www-redesign] Too much?
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:22:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e88602705032413226e1548fc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111698222.20019.23.camel@jimboy>

I disagree. It doesn't seem all the bloated at all. I'm on a dialup
connection right now, and the page loaded for me very quickly. I like
the sleek look of the site, and the simple, yet elagant layout.

Gentoo's current site is very utilitarian. I think that as the gentoo
project has progressed, while it is still a very utilitarian
distribution, it has started to recently gain a good deal of polish,
and slowly it's become quite elagant. Right now, everything is
becoming more flashy, and more eye-candy oriented. This isn't wrong;
keep in mind that most people like eye-candy. However, I personally
hate bloated eye-candy. (Try browsing hotmail on dialup, or even
msn.com) I think this new website is a good balance between the demand
for eye-candy and bloat. I honestly don't see a good deal of bloat on
that site. Sure, you could argue that you don't need all the fancy
graphics, but by that logic, all graphics could be seen as bloat.
Remember, text loads very fast ;).

So, my opinion is that the current design is very nice.

On a side note... what's the current progress level of the website
redesign? Need any help?

--Chris


On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:03:42 -0500, James Dio <jim-list@psunit.com> wrote:
> Well i subscribed to this list quite some time ago and after looking
> around for quite a short time (so if I am indeed mis-informed from only
> reading a few posts bear with me) doesnt the site at
> http://www.aaronshi.com/gentoo/generic.html   look a little bloated?
> Thats what i liked about gentoo.org 's current site its simple and very
> few images and no crazy things poking at you.. IMHO i kind of like
> gentoo's current site :) That does look good and if it wasn't for it
> looking bulky then i'd absolutly love it.. Or maybe bulky is alright i
> really dont know but i figured i'd post my opinion not that its really
> my business.
> 
> 
> 


-- 

Christopher S. Case
SUNY Fredonia Co/Op Engineering
macguyvok@gmail.com
(716) 673 - 4396 (Dorm)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"To err is human. To forgive, divine. 
To fix mistakes, now that's an Engineer."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
www-redesign@gentoo.org mailing list


  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-24 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-24 21:03 [www-redesign] Too much? James Dio
2005-03-24 21:22 ` Chris Case [this message]
2005-03-25  7:55   ` Sven Vermeulen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-26  4:10 Michael Curtis Napier
2005-03-26 10:36 ` Sven Vermeulen
2005-04-01  7:38   ` Aaron Shi
2005-04-01  7:53 Michael Curtis Napier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e88602705032413226e1548fc@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=macguyvok@gmail.com \
    --cc=www-redesign@gentoo.org \
    --cc=www-redesign@robin.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox