From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Ekabo-0005xd-A5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 05:15:52 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jB95FkoN006712; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:15:46 GMT Received: from europa.telenet-ops.be (europa.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jB95Fkxr022708 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 05:15:46 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AC3338176 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:15:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from fuji.siphos.be (dD5E06DAF.access.telenet.be [213.224.109.175]) by europa.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD8E38086 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:15:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by fuji.siphos.be (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E9E40234189; Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:15:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:15:38 +0100 From: Sven Vermeulen To: www-redesign@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [www-redesign] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20051209051538.GA4630@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: www-redesign@lists.gentoo.org References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <438C7CC9.3020206@gentoo.org> <4398F3BC.40605@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: www-redesign@gentoo.org Reply-to: www-redesign@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4398F3BC.40605@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: a28dd5d7-55ed-4578-a84c-3e51e630bd5c X-Archives-Hash: 211803cee376cd8648eb105d0d917bd4 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:02:20PM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > I had about 6 months ago and swift made me change it back, he was=20 > afraid of backwards compatibility and I didn't feel like pushing the=20 > issue at the time. I did? Sorry about that then, I can't remember it and I can't see any reason why wouldn't be compatible for our s. Wkr, Sven Vermeulen --=20 Gentoo Foundation Trustee | http://foundation.gentoo.org Gentoo Documentation Project Lead | http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gdp Gentoo Council Member =20 The Gentoo Project <<< http://www.gentoo.org >>> --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDmRL6ED0QGEyH9xgRAhRWAJ9OAmmhsTYM4Z8m8VFqQVyS9MoNrACgmnQU LibE88WvsO1t6S0M+ZSWmCc= =7kGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- -- www-redesign@gentoo.org mailing list