From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Eevx6-0007th-V9 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:50:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jANEoMVi010518; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:50:22 GMT Received: from jaguar.lieber.org (jaguar.lieber.org [217.160.252.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jANEoLe6022868 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:50:21 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF3229C1EF for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jaguar.lieber.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jaguar.lieber.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19568-06 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6175529D746; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:55:04 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber To: www-redesign@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [www-redesign] Update of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20051123145504.GD12982@mail.lieber.org> References: <43840EED.2010909@gentoo.org> <001701c5f03b$a9ea52d0$6402a8c0@vega> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: www-redesign@gentoo.org Reply-to: www-redesign@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Eldrgvv4EWsIM1sO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001701c5f03b$a9ea52d0$6402a8c0@vega> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lieber.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-3.3, AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -5.893 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 6b3653a2-9b38-4ffc-aa28-1d42310d2caa X-Archives-Hash: a0299250792e3bb30f0c6fe8a95d87a9 --Eldrgvv4EWsIM1sO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 06:39:08AM -0800 or thereabouts, Aaron Shi wrote: > Sorry, but this looks worse. The colors (other than what's in the original > graphics) are way off. I'm going make a wild guess that an uncalibrated = LCD > is being used to view the site. Many panels are not capable of the full > 16.7 million range and uses dithering techniques to emulate the other > colors. So in reality, the colors when viewed on proper LCD and CRTs are > slightly off (but all the "off-ness" in colors adds up and the combined > effect is quite obvious).=20 Reviewing the two sites: http://www.aaronshi.com/gentoo/mainindex.html (original) http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org/ (current) I agree with Aaron that the original one looks far better. The colors are much more complementary, the layout is cleaner and the site looks more professional overall. My $.02. --kurt --Eldrgvv4EWsIM1sO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDhILIJPpRNiftIEYRApGTAJ0e3tUjmcW1Pp862ysbLRhZmKPVrwCeLERG q6/iHB3qCIkTaEH16G5anfU= =bPxG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Eldrgvv4EWsIM1sO-- -- www-redesign@gentoo.org mailing list