public inbox for gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
To: James Le Cuirot <chewi@gentoo.org>
Cc: gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 10:18:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <w6gzhmj2rep.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <024EBD18-1089-4E36-A251-E52135C80625@gentoo.org> (James Le Cuirot's message of "Fri, 14 Jun 2019 23:23:27 +0100")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1011 bytes --]

>>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2019, James Le Cuirot wrote:

> I don't personally use prefix so I don't really have a horse in this
> race. We're also talking about fairly edgy edge cases here. I've never
> heard of any prefix users using ROOT. I just want to make sure our
> package manager is built on solid standards that make sense. I also
> want to do right by the prefix guys.

After reading the discussion in bug 317337 again, I think that the
change should be announced on a wider scope, e.g. the gentoo-dev mailing
list. Just to make sure that everybody (prefix people in particular) is
on the same page. And especially, if we go for a retroactive change.

Also, trying to summarise it in a table:

    SYSROOT    ESYSROOT
    -----------------------------------------
    /          ${BROOT}
    ${ROOT}    ${EROOT} (= ${ROOT}${EPREFIX})
    other      ${SYSROOT}
    -----------------------------------------

Is this correct? What happens if both ROOT and SYSROOT are equal to /?
First or second row?

Ulrich

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-15  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-01 22:29 [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable James Le Cuirot
2019-06-02  6:10 ` Michał Górny
2019-06-12 22:05   ` James Le Cuirot
2019-06-02 12:28 ` Ulrich Mueller
2019-06-12 22:05   ` James Le Cuirot
2019-06-14  7:07     ` Ulrich Mueller
2019-06-13 20:09   ` James Le Cuirot
2019-06-13 22:17     ` Ulrich Mueller
2019-06-14 22:23       ` James Le Cuirot
2019-06-14 22:30         ` James Le Cuirot
2019-06-15  8:18         ` Ulrich Mueller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=w6gzhmj2rep.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de \
    --to=ulm@gentoo.org \
    --cc=chewi@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-pms@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox