From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gnap-dev+bounces-101-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1K0XOE-0001dA-Us
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 May 2008 07:45:07 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAEB5E02F1;
Mon, 26 May 2008 07:45:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from outbound-mail-40.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-40.bluehost.com [69.89.20.194])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 676F5E02F1
for <gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 26 May 2008 07:45:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 28333 invoked by uid 0); 26 May 2008 07:45:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box246.bluehost.com) (69.89.27.246)
by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 26 May 2008 07:45:04 -0000
Received: from 43.169.217.87.dynamic.jazztel.es ([87.217.169.43] helo=[192.168.100.61])
by box246.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.68)
(envelope-from <bass@gentoo.org>)
id 1K0XOB-0006HT-Cd
for gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 May 2008 01:45:04 -0600
Subject: Re: [gnap-dev] State of the union
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?jos=E9?= Alberto =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Su=E1rez_L=F3pez?= <bass@gentoo.org>
To: gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <1211719664.23566.7.camel@troy.riegger.name>
References: <1211719664.23566.7.camel@troy.riegger.name>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 09:44:27 +0200
Message-Id: <1211787867.1265.3.camel@supercoco>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gnap-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gnap-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gnap-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo GNAP development <gnap-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Identified-User: {:box246.bluehost.com:jasuarez%eneotecnologia.com:} {sentby:smtp auth 87.217.169.43 authed with jasuarez%eneotecnologia.com}
DomainKey-Status: no signature
X-Archives-Salt: 34cb93b8-de5a-47e9-b2f7-a40c9e35d647
X-Archives-Hash: 4154e7b3672e13795828f88d97aa645d
Hi,
thanks for your work :) so please next time confirm things like this
with me, in the last email i told you i was creating the repository and
than i will wait last week for a reply about the name. I was creating
this morning the new repository when i readed your email.
El dom, 25-05-2008 a las 14:47 +0200, Philipp Riegger escribi=C3=B3:
> Hi everybody!
>=20
> We just created gnap-dev on Google Code:
> http://code.google.com/p/gnap-dev/
> So please drop us (Andrey or me) a line and we will add you to the
> project.
>=20
> Furthermore we added gnap-dev as email address where all svn commits
> will be sent. This is ok, i guess, because this is a development list.
> And it is too much overhead to create an extra list for that. I filed a
> bug to get these messages whitelisted:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D223551
>=20
> Next thing: I'd like to reorganize the repository and the ebuilds. I
> would like to split it the other way around than they are at the moment.
> I'd like to have:
>=20
> A) One ebuild called gnap, that installes all gnap_* scripts,
> documentation and examples.
>=20
> B) ebuilds of the form gnap-x86-uclibc, gnap-x86-glibc,
> gnap-x86-uclibc-hardened,... for each target we support containing a
> seedstage, build gnap base fs, maybe prebuilt extensions and the portage
> snapshot. We could controll the installation of prebuild extensions,
> prebuilt base fs and maybe other stuff with USE-flags. We could also
> split the portage snapshot into an extra ebuild in case multiple targets
> share the same one.
>=20
> A should have regular version numbers, like 2.0, 2.1, whatever, B should
> only have dates as version.
>=20
> Comments?
>=20
> Thanks,
> Philipp
>=20
>=20
>=20
--
gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list