From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from <gnap-dev+bounces-42-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>) id 1I98Pd-0003Qh-TN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:49:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CNnW4T003095; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:49:32 GMT Received: from mail.bawue.net (phoenix.bawue.net [193.7.176.60]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CNnVWe003090 for <gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:49:31 GMT Received: from [193.166.89.200] (b136a.mtalo.tontut.fi [193.166.89.200]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bawue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A6FB90F2 for <gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:49:31 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gnap-dev] Some patches for gnap From: Philipp Riegger <lists@anderedomain.de> To: gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <45178.130.230.11.107.1183734500.squirrel@my.bawue.net> References: <59506.130.230.11.107.1183640031.squirrel@my.bawue.net> <1183707646.27777.15.camel@supercoco> <45178.130.230.11.107.1183734500.squirrel@my.bawue.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:49:44 +0300 Message-Id: <1184284184.22346.16.camel@b136a> Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gnap-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gnap-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gnap-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo GNAP development <gnap-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gnap-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5ee90a2d-0558-426b-b116-0f25b5ac2ac7 X-Archives-Hash: 088e0c45337455d07e67f7a7a4d5baed On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 18:08 +0300, Philipp Riegger wrote: > > To improve is ever good :) > > An alternative would be to introduce overlay handling to catalyst, but > i > think, we don't want that. :-) Catalyst can use overlays. At least ther eis a config option. I still have to test that. Just for the record... Philipp -- gnap-dev@gentoo.org mailing list