From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gnap-dev+bounces-42-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1I98Pd-0003Qh-TN
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:49:34 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6CNnW4T003095;
	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:49:32 GMT
Received: from mail.bawue.net (phoenix.bawue.net [193.7.176.60])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6CNnVWe003090
	for <gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:49:31 GMT
Received: from [193.166.89.200] (b136a.mtalo.tontut.fi [193.166.89.200])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.bawue.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A6FB90F2
	for <gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:49:31 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [gnap-dev] Some patches for gnap
From: Philipp Riegger <lists@anderedomain.de>
To: gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <45178.130.230.11.107.1183734500.squirrel@my.bawue.net>
References: <59506.130.230.11.107.1183640031.squirrel@my.bawue.net>
	 <1183707646.27777.15.camel@supercoco>
	 <45178.130.230.11.107.1183734500.squirrel@my.bawue.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:49:44 +0300
Message-Id: <1184284184.22346.16.camel@b136a>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gnap-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gnap-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gnap-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo GNAP development <gnap-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gnap-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gnap-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 5ee90a2d-0558-426b-b116-0f25b5ac2ac7
X-Archives-Hash: 088e0c45337455d07e67f7a7a4d5baed

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 18:08 +0300, Philipp Riegger wrote:
> > To improve is ever good :)
> 
> An alternative would be to introduce overlay handling to catalyst, but
> i
> think, we don't want that. :-) 

Catalyst can use overlays. At least ther eis a config option. I still
have to test that. Just for the record...

Philipp

-- 
gnap-dev@gentoo.org mailing list