public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  Re: A little light relief from endless problems
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 09:17:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yu9vdqt72fy.fsf@nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <godt75$vsl$1@ger.gmane.org> (Nikos Chantziaras's message of "Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:57:30 +0200")

At Sun, 01 Mar 2009 13:57:30 +0200 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote:

> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> As it's Sunday, here's an odd little thing.
>>
>> Not long ago, while booting this machine, four ext3 partitions
>> needed checks on remount count reaching zero. They had been set to
>> 23, 24, 25 and 26 mounts. (I didn't choose the numbers; they were
>> allocated at the time I was creating the file system.)
>>
>> Now, this box does get rebooted, but hardly 23 x 24 x 25 x 26 =
>> 358,800 times all told. At, say, two reboots per day, that would
>> take rather a long time: a little under 500 years if my arithmetic
>> is working.
>
> I think you're confused.  23 means a check each 23 mounts.  With 2
> mounts per day, that's a check every 12 days for the first and second
> disk.

I think the point is that 23, 24, 25, 26 are relatively prime so that,
if N is initially zero, it takes 23x24x25x26 increments initially for (N
mod 23), ..., (N mod 26) to all again be zero.

> Also, except mount count, there's also a time-based check.  The check
> happens whichever of the two expires first (otherwise, a system that
> gets rebooted once each two months or such would get checked in a
> timely manner.)

This second point is quite valid.

allan



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-01 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-01 11:47 [gentoo-user] A little light relief from endless problems Peter Humphrey
2009-03-01 11:57 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-03-01 14:17   ` Allan Gottlieb [this message]
2009-03-01 14:27     ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-03-01 16:51       ` Allan Gottlieb
2009-03-01 17:14         ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-03-01 16:49 ` [gentoo-user] " KH
2009-03-01 19:03   ` Allan Gottlieb
2009-03-02  7:09     ` Momesso Andrea
2009-03-02 10:52       ` Peter Humphrey
2009-03-02 11:41         ` Neil Bothwick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yu9vdqt72fy.fsf@nyu.edu \
    --to=gottlieb@nyu.edu \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox