From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1REXlK-0008D1-1u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:44:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8D2921C107; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.cs.nyu.edu (SMTP.CS.NYU.EDU [128.122.49.97]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069A321C107 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 02:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ajglap.localdomain (ool-182de1a5.dyn.optonline.net [24.45.225.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.cs.nyu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9E2hRb2005311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:43:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ajglap.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1502) id 374FF7012A; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:44:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Gottlieb To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] can't build gnome 3.2 (3.0 was ok) References: <4648346.0B5O5UOGn3@pc> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:44:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: ("Canek =?utf-8?Q?Pel=C3=A1ez_Vald=C3=A9s=22's?= message of "Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:58:04 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b4b731de04f912d8e5ed89b45e056841 On Thu, Oct 13 2011, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> >> Not sure what to do now other than wait/hope that 3.2.1 (to be released >> next week) makes it to the overlay and is better for me. > > That's an option, of course. I don't know what else you could try; > maybe try the 9999 gnome-shell version? I know the crash is happening > in spidermonkey, but perhaps te live version of gnome-shell avoids > that code path? > > The code for 3.2.1 cannot be *that* different from the live version. > Maybe it's worth a try. > > Regards. -9999 didn't help. I still get the msg in dmesg about gnome-shell failing. I went back to 3.2.0-r1. Another difficulty has arising. I don't seem to be able to get out of fallback mode. Indeed even the command I used to get into fallback before is failing now. I think this should get me out of fallback oldlap ~ # gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.session session-name gnome ** (process:3534): WARNING **: Command line `dbus-launch --autolaunch=3Da80= a835bfa47bbd35544058f0000000d --binary-syntax --close-stderr' exited with n= on-zero exit status 1: Autolaunch error: X11 initialization failed.\n (msg repeated and snipped by allan) and this is just the command I successfully executed a day or two ago that now fails oldlap ~ # gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.session session-name gnome-fallb= ack ** (process:3540): WARNING **: Command line `dbus-launch --autolaunch=3Da80= a835bfa47bbd35544058f0000000d --binary-syntax --close-stderr' exited with n= on-zero exit status 1: Autolaunch error: X11 initialization failed.\n (snipped) I should add that the first one above (trying to get back to straight gnome) was tried with the gnome-shell flag for gdm both set and unset. The failure is the same allan