From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GKMad-0005KE-OK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:06:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k84M5AYZ022153; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 22:05:10 GMT Received: from smtp.cs.nyu.edu (SMTP.CS.NYU.EDU [128.122.140.230]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k84LxTjx016786 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:59:29 GMT Received: from localhost.localdomain (ool-4578d5e5.dyn.optonline.net [69.120.213.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.cs.nyu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k84LxShT015429 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:59:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1502) id 346AA1C00; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 17:59:23 -0400 (EDT) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] another openoffice build failure References: <7573e9640609021410l1ba6cb69rb22d28369231ba8a@mail.gmail.com> <7573e9640609021916p20797b24tcde8c2e20ee3bbc8@mail.gmail.com> From: Allan Gottlieb Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 17:59:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7573e9640609021916p20797b24tcde8c2e20ee3bbc8@mail.gmail.com> (Richard Fish's message of "Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:16:05 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Archives-Salt: 6c98d3ad-7b8b-4296-8896-b79e38a296ab X-Archives-Hash: e61726967089a01ded14864541b53def At Sat, 02 Sep 2006 19:16:05 -0700 Richard Fish wrote: > On 9/2/06, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> I am not sure what to try next. I suppose I could try to revert back >> to gcc3.4.6 >> ajglap hdc10 # gcc-config --list-profiles >> [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6 >> [2] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardened >> [3] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopie >> [4] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednopiessp >> [5] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.4.6-hardenednossp >> [6] i686-pc-linux-gnu-4.1.1 * >> ajglap hdc10 # >> >> Any ideas would be welcome > > Well googling wasn't terribly helpful for me, and I couldn't find any > bug report on bugs.gentoo.org. Same here > The program that is failing ("ar") comes from binutils. Maybe you can > try the 2.17 version of binutils...it's what I built OOo with. > echo "~sys-devel/binutils-2.17 ~x86 >> /etc/portage/package.keywords > emerge --oneshot binutils > binutils-config -l # make sure it shows 2.17 as selected > emerge --oneshot openoffice I just tried this and the same error > If this doesn't work, reverting gcc versions, Same story > or maybe even just merge openoffice-bin. Well my openoffice emerged before the emerge world that accompanied the gcc upgrade still works fine so I will continue to use that. But I am disquieted by no longer being able to emerge openoffice. Clearly something is wrong somewhere. I guess I will stop pursuing it actively and wait for some more symptoms. Thanks for all your efforts. allan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list