From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-140653-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA471381F4
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AD0321C011;
	Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:51:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.cs.nyu.edu (SMTP.CS.NYU.EDU [128.122.49.97])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8C7E07FE
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:49:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ajglap.localdomain (ool-182de1a5.dyn.optonline.net [24.45.225.165])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by smtp.cs.nyu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7HCnYkm025499
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:49:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ajglap.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1502)
	id 5AB4D700A2; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:47:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] /usr/tmp -> /var/tmp a problem with new udev?
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:47:12 -0400
Message-ID: <yu9ipchadnz.fsf@nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Archives-Salt: d2ded5a9-5940-41f6-951b-2d164eb6bb51
X-Archives-Hash: 5c224efbcb1ee18280b0a2992f489c9a

I realize that new udev without dracut wants /usr part of root
filesystem.

The last few gentoo installations I have done all had
/usr/tmp symlinked to /var/tmp and I don't believe I did this symlink
manually.

Will this be a problem with new udev and no dracut or are the programs
that must run early trained not to use /usr/tmp?

thanks,
allan