From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA471381F4 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AD0321C011; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:51:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.cs.nyu.edu (SMTP.CS.NYU.EDU [128.122.49.97]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8C7E07FE for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:49:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ajglap.localdomain (ool-182de1a5.dyn.optonline.net [24.45.225.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.cs.nyu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7HCnYkm025499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ajglap.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1502) id 5AB4D700A2; Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:47:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Gottlieb To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] /usr/tmp -> /var/tmp a problem with new udev? Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 08:47:12 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Archives-Salt: d2ded5a9-5940-41f6-951b-2d164eb6bb51 X-Archives-Hash: 5c224efbcb1ee18280b0a2992f489c9a I realize that new udev without dracut wants /usr part of root filesystem. The last few gentoo installations I have done all had /usr/tmp symlinked to /var/tmp and I don't believe I did this symlink manually. Will this be a problem with new udev and no dracut or are the programs that must run early trained not to use /usr/tmp? thanks, allan