From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EckPY-0007JJ-7U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:06:48 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAHE3U46017807; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:03:30 GMT Received: from smtp.cs.nyu.edu (SMTP.CS.NYU.EDU [128.122.140.230]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAHDqrsw025457 for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 13:52:53 GMT Received: from localhost.localdomain (ool-4355e59d.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.229.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.cs.nyu.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAHDqqYG003181 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:52:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1502) id 5372153E3D; Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:52:47 -0500 (EST) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? References: <9999810b0511160820h648eb1a5o4f62300507c2b8a9@mail.gmail.com> <342e1090511161153p1fbbf3dex27a4f9603b23d7de@mail.gmail.com> <200511170744.50022.jarmstrong@wi.rr.com> <20051116225159.2b5a97a3@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <5bdc1c8b0511161903r22523683w234058c6e49a65c@mail.gmail.com> <20051117092346.47fe8d17@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> From: Allan Gottlieb Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:52:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051117092346.47fe8d17@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> (Neil Bothwick's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:23:46 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Archives-Salt: a99ea8f8-cb86-4214-a615-4c9623c72440 X-Archives-Hash: 003bac234f7cd9bcf416c0dfd4a7375a At Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:23:46 +0000 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:03:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote: > >> Would you mind sharing what changes you made to your CFLAGS to get >> the equivalent of a Stage 1 install? > > When installing a stage 3 you are using packages compiled with the > default compiler and USE flags. All I did was set them up as I wanted and > rebuilt everything with emerge -e world. The specific change I made in > this case was changing -mcpu to G4 and adding -fomit-frame-pointer, which > may be unnecessary. But that's not relevant, the emerge -e world is. What about -march ? At one point that was something that you weren't supposed to change unless using stage1. If one changes -march after stage3, are we supposed to first run bootstrap.sh before emerge -e ? Although I always did stage1 installs, I must confess to once getting into trouble by changing USE flags "too early". This taught me the advantage of first going stage1-->stage2-->stage3 with the std USE flags and only then changing USE flags. I realize that in that case one might as well start with stage3 (assuming you can change -march). thanks, allan -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list