From: Allan Gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.edu>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path?
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:52:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yu964qr4c0g.fsf@nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051117092346.47fe8d17@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> (Neil Bothwick's message of "Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:23:46 +0000")
At Thu, 17 Nov 2005 09:23:46 +0000 Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 19:03:18 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>> Would you mind sharing what changes you made to your CFLAGS to get
>> the equivalent of a Stage 1 install?
>
> When installing a stage 3 you are using packages compiled with the
> default compiler and USE flags. All I did was set them up as I wanted and
> rebuilt everything with emerge -e world. The specific change I made in
> this case was changing -mcpu to G4 and adding -fomit-frame-pointer, which
> may be unnecessary. But that's not relevant, the emerge -e world is.
What about -march ? At one point that was something that you weren't
supposed to change unless using stage1. If one changes -march after
stage3, are we supposed to first run bootstrap.sh before emerge -e ?
Although I always did stage1 installs, I must confess to once getting
into trouble by changing USE flags "too early". This taught me the
advantage of first going stage1-->stage2-->stage3 with the std USE
flags and only then changing USE flags. I realize that in that case
one might as well start with stage3 (assuming you can change -march).
thanks,
allan
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-16 16:20 [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo still on the right path? Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 18:23 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-19 15:07 ` A. Khattri
2005-11-16 19:53 ` Daniel da Veiga
2005-11-16 20:50 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:50 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 22:32 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:26 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 11:24 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 11:59 ` Nagatoro
2005-11-17 7:44 ` jarmstrong
2005-11-16 22:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 3:03 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 9:23 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 13:52 ` Allan Gottlieb [this message]
2005-11-17 14:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-11-17 17:44 ` Allan Gottlieb
2005-11-17 15:21 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-17 0:17 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-11-17 0:34 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 20:12 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:04 ` Nick Rout
2005-11-16 20:30 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:47 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 20:55 ` Benjamin Martin
2005-11-16 20:59 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 21:10 ` Mark Knecht
2005-11-16 21:20 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-16 22:31 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 23:24 ` kashani
2005-11-16 21:33 ` Manuel McLure
2005-11-16 21:53 ` Jeff Smelser
2005-11-16 20:54 ` Zac Medico
2005-11-16 22:22 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-16 22:37 ` Derek Tracy
2005-11-17 0:21 ` Richard Fish
2005-11-17 14:03 ` Bill Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-16 20:27 Budd, Tracy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yu964qr4c0g.fsf@nyu.edu \
--to=gottlieb@nyu.edu \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox