From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SSwDI-00065d-1C for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 May 2012 20:13:26 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6850AE0895; Fri, 11 May 2012 20:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.cs.nyu.edu (SMTP.CS.NYU.EDU [128.122.49.97]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB886E0850 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 20:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ajglap.localdomain (ool-182de1a5.dyn.optonline.net [24.45.225.165]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.cs.nyu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4BKBJFx018329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:11:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ajglap.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1502) id 8E6FA701F7; Fri, 11 May 2012 16:10:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Allan Gottlieb To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean asking to remove *many* perl References: Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:10:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Nikos Chantziaras's message of "Fri, 11 May 2012 18:55:37 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Archives-Salt: 4ec90d32-2537-48fe-a31a-e25debce396f X-Archives-Hash: c9104ddad26cb3eacd41b21027174fd6 On Fri, May 11 2012, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 11/05/12 17:39, Allan Gottlieb wrote: >> A recent world update followed by depclean resulted in a request to >> remove nearly 30 dev-perl packages (plus an old boost). >> >> I don't use perl, but wonder what triggered this change. I have not >> changed any use flags. >> >> My inclination is to let depclean have its way, but wanted to check here >> first in case this looks suspicious to anyone. > > Something dropped the perl dependency. Same results here. I let it > remove it and there were no problems. Thank you. That was my conclusion as well. I am letting depclean go as I type this. allan