From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01566158089 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 19:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 688162BC0C1; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 19:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6252BC013 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 19:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qg93y-000353-EB for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 21:28:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: "Nuno Silva" Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: long compiles Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 20:30:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Archives-Salt: 650fffc1-2a6c-49f6-af31-4185b1c084d7 X-Archives-Hash: bbc63430c6a9744f6e4c76ddfd24e5de On 2023-09-12, Alan McKinnon wrote: [...] > But anyways, this is not really about how to deal with long compiles, I was > asking what current packages take a long time after a 5 year absence. > > The answer is what it was always - browsers and libreoffice. I do recall > icu being a bit of a beast back then I remember insn-attrtab.c making the GCC compilation swap a lot :-) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442 -- Nuno Silva