From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-201713-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org> Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E374F158089 for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EF592BC0F7; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:42:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9E0B2BC019 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane-mx.org>) id 1qdvbn-00077g-9w for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 06 Sep 2023 18:42:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards@gmail.com> Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: sqlite downgraded by update breaks things Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2023 16:42:20 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <udaa5c$q0j$1@ciao.gmane.io> References: <uda87b$dre$1@ciao.gmane.io> <9162293.CDJkKcVGEf@rogueboard> User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply X-Archives-Salt: 95f18396-a69d-4a14-91aa-0ffe8f01eb43 X-Archives-Hash: a1c7624b7ff73d5a99aec912de88e0d2 On 2023-09-06, Michael <confabulate@kintzios.com> wrote: > The message indicates subversion needs reinstalling with the downgraded sqlite > - potentially @preserved-rebuild ought to catch this, or revdep-rebuild. I used to run revdep-rebuild after every update, but a few years ago I thought I read that was no longer a useful thing to do. I did not try @preserved-rebuild since there was no message from portage indicating it was needed. Isn't there usually a message from portage if that set is non-empty? I don't think it would have done anything, since the library file's version didn't change and subversion was indeed using the newer library. @preserved-rebuild only kicks in if the library file version changes and portage keeps the old version of the file around to keep some apps running until they are re-built to use the newer version of the library file. > You could have a go rebuilding sqlite with +static-libs, but I'm clutching at > straws here. :-/ Emerging 'subversion' did it. When I typed 'emerge svn' and something got merged without any errors I didn't even look to see exactly what -- though after I emerged subversion I did remember that emerging svn didn't take nearly as long as it should have. IMO it's a mistake to have one package called "svn" and another one called "subversion". -- Grant